Re: [fpc-pascal] Microsoft to ban Memcpy() :)

2009-05-15 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: > > Funny... always these problems with C and bounds checkings > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/15/microsoft_banishes_memcpy/ > > I'll continue here because my remark is fpc related :) Maybe we should > add something like move_s (taking

Re: [fpc-pascal] Microsoft to ban Memcpy() :)

2009-05-15 Thread Florian Klaempfl
ABorka schrieb: > Funny... always these problems with C and bounds checkings > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/15/microsoft_banishes_memcpy/ I'll continue here because my remark is fpc related :) Maybe we should add something like move_s (taking the destination size as well as the memcpy_s

Re: [fpc-pascal] Microsoft to ban Memcpy() :)

2009-05-15 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 15 May 2009, at 21:19, ABorka wrote: Funny... always these problems with C and bounds checkings Please use the fpc-other list for remarks like this. Jonas FPC mailing lists admin ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http: