In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: > > Funny... always these problems with C and bounds checkings > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/15/microsoft_banishes_memcpy/ > > I'll continue here because my remark is fpc related :) Maybe we should > add something like move_s (taking the destination size as well as the > memcpy_s recommend by MS does) in fpc as well though I can rarely > remember bugs where move overwrote destination memory.
Why, do you want FPC to be certified? :-) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
