< Charset 251 unsupported, skipping... >
Btw, what is that charset 251 in your header for a charset? :-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> Having such a page is not bad but I consider it more as something which
> can be done by the power users instead of the developers. If something
> serious is started, I'll link it to the main page.
right, but i think the "power users" read this list so i hope tht they will
help stay tuned with a
Micha Nelissen schrieb:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
If it's later fixed people might think, it's still not fixed.
That should only be changed after it's fixed I think, because if you
write "5091 to 5114" and it's still not fixed in 5115, people may also
be confused :)
It just says those revisions are
Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>> If it's later fixed people might think, it's still not fixed.
>
> That should only be changed after it's fixed I think, because if you
> write "5091 to 5114" and it's still not fixed in 5115, people may also
> be confused :)
It just says those revisions are unusable, not
On 03 Nov 2006, at 22:58, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Please don't use something like
... and higher
but a range instead:
5091 to 5114 - unusable on win32, win64 and wince
If it's later fixed people might think, it's still not fixed.
That should only be changed after it's fixed I think, because
On 11/3/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please don't use something like
... and higher
but a range instead:
5091 to 5114 - unusable on win32, win64 and wince
If it's later fixed people might think, it's still not fixed.
thanks for the hint, fixed.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalh
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
I created such page here:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Tested_Unstable_Revisions
Please don't use something like
... and higher
but a range instead:
5091 to 5114 - unusable on win32, win64 and wince
If it's later fixed people might think, it's
I created such page here:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Tested_Unstable_Revisions
I linked it from the FPC wiki page, instead of the main page, because
I consider it not important enougth for the main page.
I will also add a link on the WinCE page
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
On 11/3/06, Christian Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@Felipe, i dont want this only for wince.
for win32 and win64 fpc > 5091 is also not useable.
think an general wiki´page in the fpc wiki is better for that or not ?!
Yes, could be. Each revision would then have a note saying on which
targe
Christian Ulrich schrieb:
I think a lot of people do this like me, and its easyer when they can look
at an fpc wiki page
where they find the last revision tested from some people.
@Felipe, i dont want this only for wince.
for win32 and win64 fpc > 5091 is also not useable.
think an general wiki´
> If you want tested revisions use the releases. For trunk you are on
> your own to keep track of working revisions. Maybe for you rev A is
> good, but broken on an other platform where rev B is better.
Not all realeases are stable,i have used fpc 2.0.4 for 2 days and then used
fpc 2.1.1
because f
At 21:57 3-11-2006, you wrote:
> > If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
>
> .. but don't use smart-linking (-XX) then.
>
> better use r5180 ..
ok, i havend belived this but seems to be an compiler issue maybe the ppu
check code is broken in revisions >5191 or something else
wit
On 11/3/06, Christian Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is it possible to make a list of "tested" revisions.
i would like that i like to use an mostly actiual revision to have advance
of its benefits.
Maybe you could start that to the wince page on the wiki:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/inde
> > If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
>
> .. but don't use smart-linking (-XX) then.
>
> better use r5180 ..
ok, i havend belived this but seems to be an compiler issue maybe the ppu
check code is broken in revisions >5191 or something else
with 5180 everything seems to build
Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 17:41 schrieb Peter Vreman:
> At 17:33 3-11-2006, you wrote:
> >yes but there are some lovely stuff on the trunk ;)
> >like working debug symbols with the internal linker and so on
>
> If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
.. but don't use smart-linkin
At 17:33 3-11-2006, you wrote:
yes but there are some lovely stuff on the trunk ;)
like working debug symbols with the internal linker and so on
If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
Peter
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lis
> > My Path is set to %PATH%;d:\programme\lazarus\fpc\bin\i386-win32
> > When it woud be so easy i woudnt write to this list
>
> Sorry for trying to help...
dont be worry please, maybe ive writed a little bit hard.
iam glad that you all try to help.
>
>
> Jonas
> __
yes but there are some lovely stuff on the trunk ;)
like working debug symbols with the internal linker and so on
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Klaempfl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:28 P
> Thats is not the real problem. Its a bug somewhere in the makefile (look
> at the .o files, one of them it isn't copied, don't know which one
> anymore). Thats why compilation fails later. If you manually copy the
> rtl/units, fcl/units and install the packages wince works..
Havend copied all un
Christian Ulrich schrieb:
Hi,
I have compiled an fpc with revision 5198 bevore 5 minutes for
i386-win32 and arm-wince
compiles great. (Actual revisions dont compile)
There is heavy work ongoing so don't depend on working with trunk currently.
___
f
> Thats is not the real problem. Its a bug somewhere in the makefile (look
> at the .o files, one of them it isn't copied, don't know which one
> anymore). Thats why compilation fails later. If you manually copy the
> rtl/units, fcl/units and install the packages wince works..
Thats not for wince
On 03 Nov 2006, at 17:13, Christian Ulrich wrote:
My Path is set to %PATH%;d:\programme\lazarus\fpc\bin\i386-win32
When it woud be so easy i woudnt write to this list
Sorry for trying to help...
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.f
> But did it install into D:\Programme\lazarus\fpc\2.1.1\ ?
YES of course have deleted the old stuff except the bintools and copied
everything from d:\pp to d:\programme\lazarus\fpc
> And does this invocation of "make" use the newly compiled compiler?
My Path is set to %PATH%;d:\programme\lazaru
Thats is not the real problem. Its a bug somewhere in the makefile (look
at the .o files, one of them it isn't copied, don't know which one
anymore). Thats why compilation fails later. If you manually copy the
rtl/units, fcl/units and install the packages wince works..
Christian Ulrich wrote:
On 03 Nov 2006, at 13:15, Christian Ulrich wrote:
please read:
PPU Loading D:\Programme\lazarus\fpc\2.1.1\units\i386-win32\fcl
\zstream.ppu
Recompiling zstream, checksum changed for paszlib
PPU Loading D:\Programme\lazarus\fpc\2.1.1\units\i386-win32\fcl
\zstream.ppu
Fatal: Can't find unit z
I think you forgot to compile FCL too. You only compiled the compiler and
RTL.
Instructions here:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/WinCE_port#Building_FPC_libraries
NO !
please read:
PPU Loading D:\Programme\lazarus\fpc\2.1.1\units\i386-win32\fcl\zstream.ppu
Recompiling zstream, che
On 11/3/06, Christian Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When i try to rebuild Lazarus or just the lcl for Wince it says:
.
but how can it be for an clean compiled fpc ?!
I think you forgot to compile FCL too. You only compiled the compiler and RTL.
Instructions here:
http://www.freepas
27 matches
Mail list logo
