At 21:57 3-11-2006, you wrote:
> > If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
>
> .. but don't use smart-linking (-XX) then.
>
> better use r5180 ..
ok, i havend belived this but seems to be an compiler issue maybe the ppu
check code is broken in revisions >5191 or something else
with 5180 everything seems to build clean thanks.
is it possible to make a list of "tested" revisions.
i would like that i like to use an mostly actiual revision to have advance
of its benefits.
If you want tested revisions use the releases. For trunk you are on
your own to keep track of working revisions. Maybe for you rev A is
good, but broken on an other platform where rev B is better.
Peter
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
