Re: [fpc-pascal]version differences

2004-03-22 Thread Peter Vreman
> >> I don't know what the reason is, but I suspect the large_integer (64 > bits). >> In each case, using 1.9.X, your sources didn't compile at all. >> I changed them and now the program works correctly as far as I can >> see (at least, it reports no error). >> >> Michael. > > The source you sent d

[fpc-pascal]version differences

2004-03-22 Thread Pápai András
> I don't know what the reason is, but I suspect the large_integer (64 bits). > In each case, using 1.9.X, your sources didn't compile at all. > I changed them and now the program works correctly as far as I can > see (at least, it reports no error). > > Michael. The source you sent doesn't comp

Re: [fpc-pascal]version differences

2004-03-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, [iso-8859-2] Pápai András wrote: > > Hi! > I recently upgraded fpc on my computer (1.0.4 -> 1.0.10). Now some programs > doen't work correctly. No problems with compilig, no run-time errors, but > the program doesn't work like before. (Win32 platform). > > I attached a sourc

[fpc-pascal]version differences

2004-03-19 Thread Pápai András
Hi! I recently upgraded fpc on my computer (1.0.4 -> 1.0.10). Now some programs doen't work correctly. No problems with compilig, no run-time errors, but the program doesn't work like before. (Win32 platform). I attached a source (poweroff.pas). Compiling with 1.0.4, it works as I want. With 1.0.