> >> I don't know what the reason is, but I suspect the large_integer (64 > bits). >> In each case, using 1.9.X, your sources didn't compile at all. >> I changed them and now the program works correctly as far as I can >> see (at least, it reports no error). >> >> Michael. > > The source you sent doesn't compile with 1.0.10: > test.pas(20,49) Error: Incompatible type for arg no. 3: Got INT64, > expected > PLUID > test.pas(25,27) Error: Incompatible types: got "INT64" expected > "LARGE_INTEGER" > test.pas(33) Fatal: There were 2 errors compiling module, stopping
<snip> > And the best: both compile and run with 1.0.4! If the code compiles and works with 1.9.x than the bug is solved. It doesn't matter that 1.0.10 has a problem. We will not fix it in 1.0.x. The future and current development is 1.9.x only. Peter _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
