> 3. COMPILER DIRECTIVES
> ==
>
> Ok, I tryed "is" on Delphi and saw the difference. Patch will be corrected
> to
> your likes (class to class checking).
>
> Is there any mode present (I mean like objfpc, delphi), something like
> "relaxed"
> I would correct patch in a way that
1. ANSWER ON YOUR QUESTION
==
Sorry, my previous answer was completely wrong. This one should do the trick (if
it doesn't compile please understand that I'm on vacation without access to my
computers and fpc is not installed here). Again sorry for my mistake
Refcount works
Quoting Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ml wrote:
>
> > i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response
> > on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list
> > (usually devel list is for internal purposes of regular developers, and
> > others a
ml wrote:
> i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response
> on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list
> (usually devel list is for internal purposes of regular developers, and
> others are... well,... for others (as well as bug reporting as
> pa
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Apparently not. The patch was studied by Peter:
> 1. It introduces a new feature, and as such will be only intyroduced
> after 2.0 has been released.
No trouble, it means that all interface features I'm implementing will probably
(multilpe inheritan
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Quoting Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote:
I have downloaded and checked the patch, however I'm not a compiler
person. The RTL patch looks OK to me. have you checked what happens with
an obj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Quoting Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote:
I have downloaded and checked the patch, however I'm not a compiler person.
The RTL patch looks OK to me. have you checked what happens with an object
passed through COM ?
COM? as I already
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote:
i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response
on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list
(usually devel list is for inter
Quoting Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote:
>
> > i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response
> > on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list
> > (usually devel list is for internal purposes of regula
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote:
> i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response
> on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list
> (usually devel list is for internal purposes of regular developers, and
> others are... well,... for others (as well a
i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response
on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list
(usually devel list is for internal purposes of regular developers, and
others are... well,... for others (as well as bug reporting as
patches)), i got more r
11 matches
Mail list logo
