> 3. COMPILER DIRECTIVES > ====================== > > Ok, I tryed "is" on Delphi and saw the difference. Patch will be corrected > to > your likes (class to class checking). > > Is there any mode present (I mean like objfpc, delphi), something like > "relaxed" > I would correct patch in a way that if not "relaxed or something else > mode" is > present, use delphi strict compiler type testing, else use the relaxed > types as > they are now in my "in" implementation. > > This doesn't mean that patch won't be corrected if I won't like the > answer. > Patch (that works just like delphi) will be on Sunday when I get back from > vacation. I would just like to add a feature of no strict type checking if > possible and controled with compiler directive.
Mode objfpc/fpc is even more strict than mode delphi. I don't like the idea of having a more relaxed type checking. It is against the pascal style of strict type checking. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
