On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
I must say that I am not familiar with the parsing style you used. I wrote 2
expression parsers meanwhile, and both used a different style. see
fcl-base/fpexprpars.pp;
um... I guess
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> I must say that I am not familiar with the parsing style you used. I wrote 2
> expression parsers meanwhile, and both used a different style. see
> fcl-base/fpexprpars.pp;
um... I guess fpexprpars.pp could (should) be used with passrc
In our previous episode, Paul Nicholls said:
> >
> > Michael.
>
> Hi all,
> I am interested in expression parsers myself :)
>
> Where can I find the code for "fpexprpars.pp" and other fpc parsing code
> like that?
>
> I had bit of a look browsing the SVN online, but no luck...
That one is in
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Paul Nicholls wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Michael Van Canneyt"
To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc-passrc expression parser (issue #16914)
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Van Canneyt"
To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc-passrc expression parser (issue #16914)
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
Hello, Michael Va
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
Hello, Michael Van Canneyt,
Sorry, I can't write to the resolved issue (without re-opening) it.
- better class tree (split out binary/unary/primitive operators in subclasses)
These may break backwards compatiblity; if you prefer to do them your
Hello, Michael Van Canneyt,
Sorry, I can't write to the resolved issue (without re-opening) it.
> - better class tree (split out binary/unary/primitive operators in subclasses)
> These may break backwards compatiblity; if you prefer to do them yourself, I
> can say what I have in mind.
That's h
