Hello, Michael Van Canneyt, Sorry, I can't write to the resolved issue (without re-opening) it.
> - better class tree (split out binary/unary/primitive operators in subclasses) > These may break backwards compatiblity; if you prefer to do them yourself, I > can say what I have in mind. That's how it was originally written. However, I personally prefer to keep less subclasses. I would like to hear your ideas. thanks, dmitry P.S.. the expression parser still doesn't resolve ranges (i.e. in sets), neither simple nor complex, like: Char(6) in [Char(sizeof(Integer))..Char(SizeOf(int64))] _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
