Le 17/08/2019 à 19:39, James Richters a écrit :
I think maybe it is the calling convention... First I tried to change
libusboop.pas (libusb.pas is the old unit, libusboop.pas is the one it uses) to
stdcall, I was unable to compile it, I get an error
libusboop.pas(1456,28) Error: Incompatible
hread it would simplify
things greatly
James
-Original Message-
From: fpc-pascal On Behalf Of Jean
SUZINEAU
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 1:34 PM
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] *** SPAM *** Re: USB Human Interface Devices
Le 16/08/2019 à 17:11, James Richt
Le 16/08/2019 à 17:11, James Richters a écrit :
Can I even do threads in a console program?
Yes, you can. I have in production some console code (worse: in a dll
called by a console program written in 4gl (4js Genero www.4js.com))
with threads which compile unmodified under Linux and Window
Thank you, it's working with either 64bit or 32bit interchangeably now.
James
>I think you can get it at
>https://github.com/libusb/libusb/releases/download/v1.0.22/libusb-1.0.22.7z,
>subdirectory MinGW32/dll in the archive
___
fpc-pascal maillist - f
Le 16/08/2019 à 12:23, James Richters a écrit :
Can you tell me where to get libusb_1.0_X86.dll ?I had the x64 version
from the sample Jean sent me, but I would like to make my program work on 32bit
machines as well.
I think you can get it at
https://github.com/libusb/libusb/releases/down
> Did you try to change your driver with Zadig (https://zadig.akeo.ie/) for
> your device 10CE:EB93 ?
No, I didn't try that.. but I'm trying it now
I downloaded Zadig, and used the pulldown and selected devices until I got the
one with the USB ID I want.
It filled in as follows:
"USB Inp
Le 14/08/2019 à 01:41, James Richters a écrit :
Anyone have any thoughts on all this?
I'm busy for now, but I'll have a look as soon as possible.
Did you try to change your driver with Zadig (https://zadig.akeo.ie/)
for your device 10CE:EB93 ?
___
Le 06/08/2019 à 17:18, James Richters a
écrit :
I used this command line:
I:\Programming\FPC\3.0.4\bin\i386-win32\fpc.exe
-MObjFPC -Scghi -O1 -g -gl -l -vewnhibq -Filib\i386-win32\
-Fu.. -Fu. -FUlib\i386-win32\ -FE. -
Hi James,
Le 05/08/2019 à 13:00, James Richters a
écrit :
Hi Jean,
Thank you
very much for posting the zip, I’ll download it and see if I
can figure it out. Also thank you very much f
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:16:55 +0200
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 09/25/2015 11:09 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
"Lazarus" is the name for two completely different things
... please don't introduce confusion where there is none.
I suppose this confusion already is ubiquitous (and
On 09/25/2015 11:32 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I also ask you kindly to stop spreading FUD.
Sorry for triggering this nonsense-discussion :(
-Michael
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mail
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:16:55 +0200
Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 11:09 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> >
> > > "Lazarus" is the name for two completely different things
> >
> > ... please don't introduce confusion where there is none.
> >
> I suppose this confusion already is ubiquitous (and min
On 09/25/2015 11:09 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> "Lazarus" is the name for two completely different things
... please don't introduce confusion where there is none.
I suppose this confusion already is ubiquitous (and miner as the
"_first_name_" of the LCL *is* "Lazarus (Component Library)" ).
O
On 08/20/2015 05:39 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Might be worthwhile to test the ARM variant again, because if that
allows normal C/C++ applications as well, then we could at least add a
arm-win32 target for that (I've seen that mingw-w64 provides
arm-binutils so that problem could be solved as well
Am 20.08.2015 16:21 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 08/20/2015 02:31 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>>
>> Microsoft will probably only allow the usage of Apps (in contrast to
normal Win32 programs) there. Thus of course it requires the RT API.
>>
>
> I am happy to report that you are wrong :-)
>
> A c
On 08/20/2015 02:31 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Microsoft will probably only allow the usage of Apps (in contrast to
normal Win32 programs) there. Thus of course it requires the RT API.
I am happy to report that you are wrong :-)
A colleague of mine already since a few days does have the Intel I
On 08/20/2015 02:31 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Please keep in mind that while Windows 10 works on PCs, smartphones,
the XBox, the HoloLens and other embedded systems this does not mean
that developers are allowed to use the Win32 API everywhere (in fact
the only one which allows it seems to be PC)
Am 20.08.2015 12:45 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 08/20/2015 08:02 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Not if Microsoft requires apps to use the Windows RT APIs (probably even
in form of universal apps). Because FPC has zero, null, nadda support for
this.
>>
>> And even then you'd need a suitabl
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 08/20/2015 08:02 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Not if Microsoft requires apps to use the Windows RT APIs (probably even in
form of universal apps). Because FPC has zero, null, nadda support for
this.
And even then you'd need a suitable assembler th
On 08/20/2015 08:02 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Not if Microsoft requires apps to use the Windows RT APIs (probably
even in form of universal apps). Because FPC has zero, null, nadda
support for this.
And even then you'd need a suitable assembler that can assemble to
ARM-COFF (don't know whether
On 07/30/2015 02:21 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Event (binary Semaphore) and CriticalSection (process local Mutex).
I see.
Thanks,
-Michael
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-
On Thu, May 8, 2014 16:34, Andrew Haines wrote:
.
.
Hello all,
As you probably noticed, some spammer or virus misused an address of one
of legitimate FPC users and sent several spam messages to fpc-devel and
fpc-pascal lists. Unfortunately, these e-mails slipped through our
anti-spam measures.
waldo kitty schrieb:
> ummm... speaking as one who has fought the spammers and won their
mailbox back from them, this is much bovine fecal material... i have
fought "them" from +1000/day spams back to less than ~5/day... it is
very possible but one nes to stay vigilant and report the spams to t
On 3/11/2012 08:08, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list and
then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new members
are moderated by default. This may result in some new members' first real
po
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 11 Mar 2012, at 13:21, Frank Church wrote:
>
> > I agree that it is too early to moderate join requests on account of this
> > one message .
>
> I won't moderate join requests (there is no way to know whether a new
> subscriber will be a s
On 11 Mar 2012, at 12:39, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> If too much gets moderated, we could install spam assassin on scenergy
> and moderate only messages above a certain treshhold.
Is there no spamassassin on scenergy yet? I wouldn't mind at all if were added.
Jonas__
On 11 Mar 2012, at 13:21, Frank Church wrote:
> I agree that it is too early to moderate join requests on account of this
> one message .
I won't moderate join requests (there is no way to know whether a new
subscriber will be a spammer or not). It's just that their messages will
default to be
On 11 March 2012 12:08, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>
> Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list
>> and then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new
>> members are moderated by default. This may result in some new member
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list and
then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new members
are moderated by default. This may result in some new members' first real posts
to be accidentally discarded along with
Am 11.03.2012 12:29, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the
> list and then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so
> that new members are moderated by default. This may result in some
> new members' first real posts to be
Hi,
Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list and
then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new members
are moderated by default. This may result in some new members' first real posts
to be accidentally discarded along with the spam that's h
31 matches
Mail list logo
