On 26/10/2011 09:44, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
> On 25/10/2011 12:52, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
>> One can debate the syntax. I won't, since even while I have
>> similar reservations, that will lead to the usual Delphi sucks
>> debate, possible implementation of an-orphaned-at-birth FPC
>> specific sy
On 25/10/2011 12:52, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> One can debate the syntax. I won't, since even while I have similar
> reservations, that will lead to the usual Delphi sucks debate, possible
> implementation of an-orphaned-at-birth FPC specific syntax, and in the end
> the Delphi syntax always pre
