On 26/10/2011 09:44, Lukasz Sokol wrote: > On 25/10/2011 12:52, Marco van de Voort wrote: > >> One can debate the syntax. I won't, since even while I have >> similar reservations, that will lead to the usual Delphi sucks >> debate, possible implementation of an-orphaned-at-birth FPC >> specific syntax, and in the end the Delphi syntax always prevails, >> leading to a lot of wasted time in discussion and implementation of >> own inventions. >> >> That is such a common pattern on these lists, I'm thinking about an >> acronym for it to save time :-) So sufficient to say, I think own >> syntax inventions are worse than the problem in the first place, >> and sooner or later we have to live with it. >> > > [OT] It's the Let's Screw FPC Guys Life [LSFGL] warrior call of the > Borland/CodeGear/Embracadero employees ;) > > L. >
or Change Lazarus And QUit Emancipating language-Rules (CLAQUER). :J L. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
