Am 17.04.2013 11:11, schrieb leledumbo:
You're missing the again. :)
*self-headcut
Can it be that your E-Mail client misinterprets the "<...>" (with only
one string as "value") as HTML tags? Because I can't see the "" I had
written to you in your quotation.
Not currently. It might be a
> You're missing the again. :)
*self-headcut
> Not currently. It might be a useful extension however. I'll need to test
> what Delphi says about this...
OK, I'll wait
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Correct-way-for-partial-generic-specializ
Am 17.04.2013 02:11 schrieb "leledumbo" :
> > One can argue however that the following should be valid as well (AFAIK
it
> > is not currently):
>
> Yes, this is my original question. Let me rephrase:
>
> Having this declaration:
>
> type
> generic TType1 = class end;
>
> Why the following is not
> This must only work if you write "generic TType2 =...". Otherwise this is
a bug.
The code should have it, I missed it when copypaste-ing.
> One can argue however that the following should be valid as well (AFAIK it
> is not currently):
Yes, this is my original question. Let me rephrase:
Havi
Sorry, I miss something:
generic TType2 = ...
:">
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Correct-way-for-partial-generic-specialization-tp5714160p5714162.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
