Am 17.04.2013 02:11 schrieb "leledumbo" <leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id>: > > One can argue however that the following should be valid as well (AFAIK it > > is not currently): > > Yes, this is my original question. Let me rephrase: > > Having this declaration: > > type > generic TType1<A,B> = class end; > > Why the following is not valid: > > generic TType2 = specialize TType1<A,String>;
You're missing the <A> again. :) > but this one is: > > generic TType2 = class(specialize TType1<A,String>) end; > > ? > > Is it possible to do partial generic specialization without the need of > inheritance? Not currently. It might be a useful extension however. I'll need to test what Delphi says about this... Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
