In our previous episode, Marc Weustink said:
> > General" or "Using FreePascal -> General" (or more specific -> "Bugs /
> > Patches")
>
> I see no problem in adding
> Freepascal / Compiler
> General
> Rtl
> Packages
>
> (and maybe move databases)
Textmode ide ? :-)
__
dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
I'm not sure if forums are to be merged or not, but why not to start
an FPC specific thread on Lazarus forum?
For example there're a lot of RTL/FCL specific subject, like this one:
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,8272.msg39707/topicseen.html#new
The
I'm not sure if forums are to be merged or not, but why not to start
an FPC specific thread on Lazarus forum?
For example there're a lot of RTL/FCL specific subject, like this one:
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,8272.msg39707/topicseen.html#new
The subject is not LCL related
http://groups.google.com/group/forpas/about
2009/12/18 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
>>
>> The most important thing now is that (at least) one
>> person actually starts *coding* and making his source available. Where is
>> not that
>> important.
>
>
> I agree 100%.
>
>
>
> Regards
Ok!
2009/12/22 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Osvaldo Filho wrote:
>> anything in the project, once registered as participants, with a
>> schedule public, voting technologies: svn, git, googlegroups, OPF, db,
>> other frameworks, etc.
>
> I say it again. Just register the project and start coding. You bein
Lee Jenkins wrote:
>
> Was "Field of Dreams" that long ago? Thanks Graeme, I don't think I felt
> quite
> as old before this. :-)
Yeah, that was the movie I was referring too. :-) I just celebrated my 35
birthday, so now I feel very old (the downhill part is getting closer). But
clearly your
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bee Jay wrote:
Yes, and it would take forever if no one dare to start it. ;)
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitHub and start coding. Maybe
somebody will contribute at some stage. Like they said in some old movie:
"Build it and they will come".
Was "Fie
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
> anything in the project, once registered as participants, with a
> schedule public, voting technologies: svn, git, googlegroups, OPF, db,
> other frameworks, etc.
I say it again. Just register the project and start coding. You being the
first developer, you have the honour o
(google translate)
Why not start?
We did not start because it is not interesting or because can not be done?
After all, is it possible to do a good job for the web in Pascal?
Why not start a project for a Forum in Pascal, without specifying
anything in the project, once registered as participants
Paul Nicholls schrieb:
>>
>> For me, i like to see Pascal generate good web application, especially
>> if it had Right To Left support :)
> What is right to left support?
Bidi support as e.g. semitic languages require.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas
Zaher Dirkey wrote:
> Are you discussing about build Forum or CMS using fpWeb/pascal?
I thought this message thread was about a Forum app implemented in fpWeb.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
___
- Original Message -
From: "Zaher Dirkey"
To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Forum merger
Are you discussing about build Forum or CMS using fpWeb/pascal?
It is need use also CSS and JavaScript
Are you discussing about build Forum or CMS using fpWeb/pascal?
It is need use also CSS and JavaScript and Database.
This kind of projects take a long time with many security bugs need to
fix it immediately, it is not like a local desktop application,
and after that what the real profits?
For me
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> The most important thing now is that (at least) one
> person actually starts *coding* and making his source available. Where is not
> that
> important.
I agree 100%.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http:/
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
I really don't care
where projects are created - I think SourceForge or GitHub are more visible
and accessible by all. So that would be my first choice anyway.
I really don't care either. The most important thing now is that (at least) one
person actually starts *co
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> I didn't think Mattias commented on this thread. Do you mean Matthias,
ah, spelling mistake from my side. Yes, I was agreeing with what Matthias
Klumpp said.
> who suggested to use Git on the FPC svn server?
Then we can't call it a FPC SVN server any more. :-) I rea
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
I agree with Mattias.
I didn't think Mattias commented on this thread. Do you mean Matthias,
who suggested to use Git on the FPC svn server?
Vincent
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://list
Bee Jay wrote:
>
> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
> almost know nothing about fpWeb.
Well if you don't use it, you will never learn it. There seems to be 4 or
so developers interested in this. ANYBODY, just create a damn repository
and start coding - no p
Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> A. Because there no Git Server on the FPC SVN server.
Git doesn't need a server/daemon app to work on a server - anyway, git
includes everything needed. Anyway, SourceForge and GitHub etc all support
Git repositories with no problems - so we don't need to disturb the F
Matthias Klumpp schreef:
server, this is not really a problem.
Why don't use Git this time?
A. Because there no Git Server on the FPC SVN server.
It's making code review and code merging from
other sources a lot easier.
I don't understand what you mean here.
Vincent
__
The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to
use
an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
It works with all 4 types.
Is there any demo or documentation about them, especially the FCGI? I
only saw CGI demos and very lack of documentation arou
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:23:08 +0100 (CET), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
>
>>> Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
>>> Bee can create a sourceforge project?
>>
>> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
>> almost
>> know nothing about fpWeb.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:23:08 +0100 (CET), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
>
>>> Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
>>> Bee can create a sourceforge project?
>>
>> If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
>> almost
>> know nothing about fpWeb.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I almost
know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from this project. The
project owner should be someone w
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
almost know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from
this project. The project owner should be someone who knows how to
build (at least) the
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use
an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
It works with all 4 types.
That's good news! Can you explain more about what
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
2009/12/17 Graeme Geldenhuys :
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>> The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use
>> an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
>> It works with all 4
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> The advantage of fpweb is that it doesn't matter whether you want to use
> an apache module, plain cgi or fastcgi, or in a standalone server.
> It works with all 4 types.
That's good news! Can you explain more about what you mean by "standalone
server"? One of our
So I would recommend going with something closer to home (part of
FPC) -
like fpWeb. This gives much better certainty that it will be
continuously
maintained - even if that only means no new feature but at least
compilable
with latest FPC.
Yes, that's also the main reason of mine to build
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Andreas Berger wrote:
If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or ExtPascal
(fully Ajax) because that's what I know and have been experience with. I
myself prefer to use fpWeb since it's provided by FPC's FCL. No third party
dependency is good for new
Osvaldo Filho wrote:
> Powtils + FreeSpider ?
I'm currently using Powtils for our company CGI projects, but thinking of
moving over to fpWeb in the new year, simply because I like to reduce 3rd
Party dependencies, and Powtils seems rather abandonded. I'm still stuck on
a locally modified 1.6.0.2 s
If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or
ExtPascal (fully Ajax) because that's what I know and have been
experience with. I myself prefer to use fpWeb since it's provided by
FPC's FCL. No third party dependency is good for new comers, and it's
also better FPC/Lazarus prom
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
Powtils + FreeSpider ?
What do those have that fpWeb does not have ?
To my knowledge, PowTils is not even OOP...
Michael.
2009/12/16 Michael Van Canneyt :
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitH
FreeSpider http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php?topic=7439.0
Powtils http://code.google.com/p/powtils/
2009/12/16 Osvaldo Filho :
> Powtils + FreeSpider ?
>
>
> 2009/12/16 Michael Van Canneyt :
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
>>
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge o
Powtils + FreeSpider ?
2009/12/16 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
>
>>> So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitHub and start coding.
>>> Maybe
>>> somebody will contribute at some stage. Like they said in some old movie:
>>> "Build it and they will come".
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitHub and start coding. Maybe
somebody will contribute at some stage. Like they said in some old movie:
"Build it and they will come".
If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or ExtPascal
(f
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitHub and start
coding. Maybe
somebody will contribute at some stage. Like they said in some old
movie:
"Build it and they will come".
If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or
ExtPascal (fully Ajax) because that's what I kn
Yes, this is it. I don't have any experience in building web-applications
with Pascal, but if someone registers a new project at Gitorious or
somewhere else I would like to help as far as I can.
As would I. I will soon need to write a CGI program, and this would be a
great way.
__
I would be interested in this project. I have done web development with
free pascal (using uncgi way back when and synapse recently).
Is there a lead or project admin for this? I don't have the time for that
responsibility at the moment but would definitely be able to help with all
the stages (f
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:18:54 -0300, Osvaldo Filho
wrote:
> I like the idea!
> When I see MonoDevelop and compare with Lazarus, I see that we need
> more ideas to the market. I see no problem in being more attractive to
> the market. I see no problem in bringing new fans to Lazarus. The tool
> is g
I like the idea!
When I see MonoDevelop and compare with Lazarus, I see that we need
more ideas to the market. I see no problem in being more attractive to
the market. I see no problem in bringing new fans to Lazarus. The tool
is good. The FPC is mature. We need things that with a larger
community
Bee Jay wrote:
>
> Yes, and it would take forever if no one dare to start it. ;)
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitHub and start coding. Maybe
somebody will contribute at some stage. Like they said in some old movie:
"Build it and they will come".
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI
When we planned to move the lazarus forum the same discussion was
started. It took months without result.
Because not many people know how to build a web application using
pascal. That's why I propose some of us who have experience with that
to build one. This project can be used to promote
The ExtPascal statement is not quite correct; you can perfectly make
a search-engine friendly site, but you must cater for this when you
start your design. It diminishes the speed slightly, but not so much
that it hurts.
Yes, I knew that, though I didn't like it. I still prefer using fpWeb
Bee Jay wrote:
We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums?
I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum.
Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
ExtPascal)? Specially dedicated for FPC and Lazarus users. It can be a
showcase that pascal (F
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Bee Jay wrote:
Time?
I believe I could make a basic forum application within a few days, in my
spare time, using ExtPascal. But I myself don't think ExtPascal would be the
correct tool to be used since it creates a non search engine friendly
application (because of Aj
On 13 Dec 2009, at 12:51, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> I'm all for merging, if only to get the standaard phpbb possibility to get a
> list of new msgs.
FWIW, you can also do that with the current community forum: log in, go to a
forum's main page, and click at the bottom on "klik hier om een ken
Time?
I believe I could make a basic forum application within a few days, in
my spare time, using ExtPascal. But I myself don't think ExtPascal
would be the correct tool to be used since it creates a non search
engine friendly application (because of Ajax). I think fpWeb would be
the bes
if someone appear with the native pascal forum solution we will
create a site based on it and merge everything there :)
Is there someone out there had done this (pascal forum)? AFAIK, I only
knew one: Powtils forum (which is now closed). Honestly, I never used
fpWeb because I was a Powtils
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
ExtPascal)?
Time?
So not to loose our time we can merge to the lazarus forum first and
then if someone appear with the native pascal forum solution we will
create a site based on it and merge
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Bee Jay wrote:
> Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
> ExtPascal)?
I think this is separate from what I proposed. We can do the merger
now into the Lazarus forum, and when this pascal forum becomes as good
as the Lazarus forum en
Am Sunday 13 December 2009 13:08:08 schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
> Bee Jay schrieb:
> >> We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums?
> >> I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum.
> >
> > Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
> > ExtPascal)?
Bee Jay schrieb:
>> We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums?
>> I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum.
>
> Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
> ExtPascal)?
Time?
___
fpc-pascal mailli
Am Sunday 13 December 2009 12:53:03 schrieb Bee Jay:
> > Then it would be possible to make a userfriendly forum and to add
> > useful
> > functions.
>
> Of course, since we have all the source code that we are fluent at. :D
> Another thing is... it could also be a test suite for fpWeb both on
> per
Then it would be possible to make a userfriendly forum and to add
useful
functions.
Of course, since we have all the source code that we are fluent at. :D
Another thing is... it could also be a test suite for fpWeb both on
performance and maintenance which both usually become main
consid
In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said:
> > Fine with me but is there a tool to merge the community site into the
> > forum software used by lazarus?
> >
> How the community site is built? Does it uses own made engine or some
> well known?
Some netscape application server thingy iirc. Dani
Am Sunday 13 December 2009 12:36:10 schrieb Bee Jay:
> > We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums?
> > I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum.
>
> Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
> ExtPascal)? Specially dedicated for FPC and Laza
We have already merged the wikis, what about merging the forums?
I would propose merging into the Lazarus forum.
Why don't we make our own forum application using fpWeb (or Powtils or
ExtPascal)? Specially dedicated for FPC and Lazarus users. It can be a
showcase that pascal (FPC/Lazarus in
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Fine with me but is there a tool to merge the community site into the
forum software used by lazarus?
How the community site is built? Does it uses own made engine or some
well known?
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
___
fpc-pas
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that few people use the FPC Forum and questions often
> stay months without answer. I would answer more questions, but
> monitoring 2 forums is too much work. We have already merged the
> wikis, what about merging the forums? I would p
Hello,
I've noticed that few people use the FPC Forum and questions often
stay months without answer. I would answer more questions, but
monitoring 2 forums is too much work. We have already merged the
wikis, what about merging the forums? I would propose merging into the
Lazarus forum.
Not to me
61 matches
Mail list logo
