On 15/06/17 17:45, Bernd Mueller wrote:
On 06/15/2017 10:34 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Yes, but I was asking about the FPC situation. I'm desperately
resisting local pressure to write code that might end up non-trivial
in C/C++.
I realized a project with an ATTiny1634. Nothing special: I us
On 15/06/17 16:45, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
At the risk of making myself unpopular: because right now I /don't/ have> time.
Sorry, I didn't mean this personal to you. I was just a bit triggered onthe fact that
people offer competing p
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> At the risk of making myself unpopular: because right now I /don't/ have
> time.
Sorry, I didn't mean this personal to you. I was just a bit triggered on
the fact that people offer competing products on FPC status requests,
because I've seen it
Am 15.06.2017 um 14:10 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> On 15/06/17 11:30, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
mikroPascal (not free) supports AVR and many other chips.> >
https://shop.mikroe.com/compilers/mikropascal/avr-electronic-licen
On 15/06/17 11:30, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
mikroPascal (not free) supports AVR and many other chips.> >
https://shop.mikroe.com/compilers/mikropascal/avr-electronic-license> > Brian>> Yes, but
I was asking about the FPC situation. I'
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > mikroPascal (not free) supports AVR and many other chips.
> > https://shop.mikroe.com/compilers/mikropascal/avr-electronic-license
> > Brian
>
> Yes, but I was asking about the FPC situation. I'm desperately resisting
> local pressure to write
On 15/06/17 11:15, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 08:34:49 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:> On 14/06/17 20:15, Brian wrote:>
> mikroPascal (not free) supports AVR and many other chips.> >
https://shop.mikroe.com/compilers/mikropascal/avr-electronic-license> > Brian> > Yes, but
Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 08:34:49 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> On 14/06/17 20:15, Brian wrote:
> > mikroPascal (not free) supports AVR and many other chips.
> > https://shop.mikroe.com/compilers/mikropascal/avr-electronic-license
> > Brian
>
> Yes, but I was asking about the FPC situation. I'
On 14/06/17 20:15, Brian wrote:
mikroPascal (not free) supports AVR and many other chips.
https://shop.mikroe.com/compilers/mikropascal/avr-electronic-license
Brian
Yes, but I was asking about the FPC situation. I'm desperately resisting
local pressure to write code that might end up non-trivi
mikroPascal (not free) supports AVR and many other chips.
https://shop.mikroe.com/compilers/mikropascal/avr-electronic-license
Brian
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/FPC-for-AVR-tp5729005p5729056.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing
On 04 Jun 2017 8:29 PM, "Mark Morgan Lloyd" <
markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
>
> What sort of targets are people looking at, what sort of debugging is
available, and has anybody experimented with the "AVR Dragon"?
As a hobbyist I've built some simple projects with arduino and then
stan
What sort of targets are people looking at, what sort of debugging is
available, and has anybody experimented with the "AVR Dragon"?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
__
12 matches
Mail list logo
