On 15/06/17 17:45, Bernd Mueller wrote:
On 06/15/2017 10:34 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Yes, but I was asking about the FPC situation. I'm desperately
resisting local pressure to write code that might end up non-trivial
in C/C++.
I realized a project with an ATTiny1634. Nothing special: I used both
UARTs (interrupt driven), had to handle a small shaft encoder and had to
do a little bit banging on the GPIOs. All together, I used 6 Interrupts.
For debugging, I implemented a third "soft-UART", which could send only.
At any time, I could switch back to the pascal compiler, which I used
over the last 17 years for AVR. But I am not going back, too much
advantages on the fpc side to me :-)
Thanks for that, encouraging.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
