On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-pascal wrote:
Still, it is more logical to place it under utils, with the rest of the
programs.
The argument about the time to compile seems simply false to me:
If you consider the FPC toplevel 'make all' as the only command to
issue, then you may
Am 14.03.2024 um 11:04 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 2024-03-14 11:06, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal wrote:
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:04 schreef Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
To me it therefore seems a better idea to move the IDE to utils, and to
have a
toplevel make command tha
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:52 schreef Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal:
"OK, that would be addressed in case of inclusion under utils as well.
Even more so, actually - users who want to recompile packages for
whatever reason (e.g. to have debug information included as discussed
here recently ;-) ) aren't
On 2024-03-14 11:06, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal wrote:
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:04 schreef Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
To me it therefore seems a better idea to move the IDE to utils, and
to have a
toplevel make command that does the same as 'make all' simply without
the
utilities.
Op 14-3-2024 om 11:04 schreef Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal:
To me it therefore seems a better idea to move the IDE to utils, and
to have a
toplevel make command that does the same as 'make all' simply without the
utilities. Or have a 'NOUTILS=1' define.
Or let fpmake simply build the
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
I agree, I'm also not very fond of the IDE being in pack
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
> I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
> "utils" directory with programs.
I agree, I'm also not very fond of the IDE being in packages, but most of
the team considers it a legacy piece of co
On 2024-03-14 09:34, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
Thanks, Karoly and Marco.
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
Well, yes, it's somewhat confusing admittedly. The IDE sources used to
be located at the higher
Op 14-3-2024 om 09:34 schreef Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal:
Thanks, Karoly and Marco.
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
Roughly the RTL is a base set of units needed for the compiler itself.
When the compiler bo
Thanks, Karoly and Marco.
I thought "packages" were libraries not applications, as there is an
"utils" directory with programs.
Thankyou again,
Guillermo Martínez.
El Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:45:19 +0100
Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal
escribió:
> Op 13-3-2024 om 21:34 schreef Karoly Balogh via fp
Op 13-3-2024 om 21:34 schreef Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal:
H
Where are they? Why aren't with the official source packages?
But they are. The IDE code is here:
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/tree/main/packages/ide
It also depends on Free Vision, which is here:
https://gitlab.
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, Guillermo Martínez Jiménez via fpc-pascal wrote:
> Hi Pascaloids,
>
> I was looking for the FP IDE sources to check how it renders the ASCII
> table and manage the mouse input, but I'm not able to find them.
> They're not in GitLab, not in the source packages, not in the
Hi Pascaloids,
I was looking for the FP IDE sources to check how it renders the ASCII
table and manage the mouse input, but I'm not able to find them.
They're not in GitLab, not in the source packages, not in the download
pages. Lazarus Wiki has two pages "Textmode IDE" and "Textmode IDE
developme
In our previous episode, Klaus Hartnegg said:
> I'm struggling with two issues with the Search,Symbol (Browse) function
> of the FreePascal IDE.
Afaik browse hasn't been worked on in a long time.
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21113
___
fpc-p
Hi,
I'm struggling with two issues with the Search,Symbol (Browse) function
of the FreePascal IDE.
Are these known issues, or is something wrong with how I installed or
configured FreePascal?
1: With duplicate names it always shows the results for the one which
was declared first. Regardle
When I was on Windows, "use another tty for debuggee" works fine. The output
gets its own console, and I can debug while watching the output. I'm on
Kubuntu now so my terminal is Konsole. If I set /usr/bin/konsole as
debuggee, then the program doesn't seem to run (the breakpoint line never
gets gre
On 1/4/12, Pierre Free Pascal wrote:
> Did you try to "manually" (meaning with some other text editor, or sed
> script)
> remove the offending line -Cp386 from fp.cfg?
Yes, and that works.
> The problem might come from a fp.cfg that was created by an earlier
> version
> of Free Pascal for wh
age d'origine-
> De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de Bart
> Envoyé : mardi 3 janvier 2012 19:10
> À : FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Objet : [fpc-pascal] FP IDE: Error: Illegal parameter: -Cp386
>
>
I recently updated to fpc 2.6.0
Now I cannot compile anything in the FP IDE (Version 1.0.12 2011/12/25).
Program test;
{$mode objfpc}
{$h+}
begin
end.
I try to build/make:
Error: Illegal parameter: -Cp386
This is the auto-generated fp.cfg file:
# Automatically created file, don't edit.
#IFDEF
On 27/08/2011, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> There is also codecomplete but afaik that is just macro expansion not very
> intelligent.
I often find that [macro expansion] more useful than the supposed
"intelligent" IDE's that often get things like indentation, begin..end
placement etc wrong. Flor
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
> >> Is there a keyboard shortcut for FP IDE (text IDE included with FPC)
> >> to jump from the interface section to the implementation section of a
> >> method.
> >
> > No. As far as I know, it does not have any functionality to parse the
> > structure of
On Fri, August 26, 2011 23:59, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2011, at 23:56, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
>> Is there a keyboard shortcut for FP IDE (text IDE included with FPC)
>> to jump from the interface section to the implementation section of a
>> method.
>
> No. As far as I know, it does not
>
> In X11 I opened an xterm window, and ran the FP ide. Pressing Alt+F3
> to again try and close an editor window, instead of closing it I get
> text inserted into the current editor window:
>
>1;33R
>
> I also did the "learn keys" again while I was running FP under xterm,
> thinking th
On 27/08/2011, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
> Mostly incomplete/inconsistent terminal implementations. Best bet is
> xterm or text mode console.
I tried both your suggestions. First switching to the linux console
(not using X11). When I try and Alt+F3 to close one of the editor
windows, Linux rather
Am 27.08.2011 00:03, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> Is this issue only a problems with FP IDE, or is it a
> more general FreeVision + Linux issues?
>
Mostly incomplete/inconsistent terminal implementations. Best bet is
xterm or text mode console.
___
fpc-
Hi,
I'm using Linux (ubuntu 8.04.4) with FP IDE (text mode ide). I went
through the "learn keys" dialog and it detected all the keys I
pressed. Yet when I'm in a source code unit and press some of the
keyboard shortcuts (eg: Ctrl+F7 - add watch), it does nothing.
Or when I run it inside the Gnome
On 26 Aug 2011, at 23:56, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Is there a keyboard shortcut for FP IDE (text IDE included with FPC)
> to jump from the interface section to the implementation section of a
> method.
No. As far as I know, it does not have any functionality to parse the structure
of the sour
Hi,
Is there a keyboard shortcut for FP IDE (text IDE included with FPC)
to jump from the interface section to the implementation section of a
method.
Like Delphi or Lazarus's Ctrl+Shift+[up|down]
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platfo
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> On 30/08/2007, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Set up the correct unit directories under Options->Directories
>
>> So does that mean FP IDE doesn't read the global fpc.cfg file located
>> it /etc or in my $HOME directory? If it doesn't, why not? It wou
On 30/08/2007, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that the cmdline compiler, and the IDE compiler are two
> separate instances of the compiler. The textmode has fpc.cfg, the IDE its
> own (possibly directory/project specific) settings.
Oh I see. So the FP IDE doesn't j
> On 30/08/2007, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Set up the correct unit directories under Options->Directories
> So does that mean FP IDE doesn't read the global fpc.cfg file located
> it /etc or in my $HOME directory? If it doesn't, why not? It would
> make sense to do so?
>
> B
On 30/08/2007, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Set up the correct unit directories under Options->Directories
>
So does that mean FP IDE doesn't read the global fpc.cfg file located
it /etc or in my $HOME directory? If it doesn't, why not? It would
make sense to do so?
BTW:
I'm only
On 30 Aug 2007, at 11:28, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
What do I need to setup in the FP IDE to be able to compile a
simple little app?
Set up the correct unit directories under Options->Directories
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.
Hi,
What do I need to setup in the FP IDE to be able to compile a simple little app?
FPC is setup in my PATH and I can compile the same project from the
command line without problems.
Command Line:
> fpc testversion.pas
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.1.5 [2007/08/10] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-
Tiziano_mk wrote:
> I'd like to know why the IDE Options|Environment|Colors is missing?
>
> It doesn't seem a bug since in the sources it is clearly commented out,
> so I think that there should be a reason for that...
Yes, there is a reason: this option was based on features provided in unit
Col
I'd like to know why the IDE Options|Environment|Colors is missing?
It doesn't seem a bug since in the sources it is clearly commented out,
so I think that there should be a reason for that...
tiziano
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.fre
Op Fri, 6 Apr 2007, schreef Tiziano_mk:
> Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >
> > Op Wed, 4 Apr 2007, schreef Tiziano_mk:
> >
> > > maibe I make something wrong, but if I install FPC2.0.4 on Ubuntu
> > > 6.06 the
> > > FP-IDE responds randomly to the mouse commands (all menus and
> > > keyboard
> > > com
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Wed, 4 Apr 2007, schreef Tiziano_mk:
maibe I make something wrong, but if I install FPC2.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06 the
FP-IDE responds randomly to the mouse commands (all menus and keyboard
commands are working).
any suggestion to resolve it?
Can you check if Debian bug 4
Op Wed, 4 Apr 2007, schreef Tiziano_mk:
>
> maibe I make something wrong, but if I install FPC2.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06 the
> FP-IDE responds randomly to the mouse commands (all menus and keyboard
> commands are working).
>
> I see the same problem on Free Vision Apps.
>
> (it seems to me that it
Marco van de Voort wrote:
maibe I make something wrong, but if I install FPC2.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06
the FP-IDE responds randomly to the mouse commands (all menus and
keyboard commands are working).
I see the same problem on Free Vision Apps.
(it seems to me that it could be a problem on ncurses,
> maibe I make something wrong, but if I install FPC2.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06
> the FP-IDE responds randomly to the mouse commands (all menus and
> keyboard commands are working).
>
> I see the same problem on Free Vision Apps.
>
> (it seems to me that it could be a problem on ncurses, but I'm not a
maibe I make something wrong, but if I install FPC2.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06
the FP-IDE responds randomly to the mouse commands (all menus and
keyboard commands are working).
I see the same problem on Free Vision Apps.
(it seems to me that it could be a problem on ncurses, but I'm not an
expert o
Daniel Franzini wrote:
> I'm trying to write some pascal code on a DOS env (FreeDOS 1.0). Is the
> IDE
> for this plataform mantained?! The command line compiler does run fine,
> but
> the IDE shows up and quickly disapears.
>
> Has anyone suffered this before?!!??
Well, in general there are quite
Op Thu, 11 Jan 2007, schreef Daniel Franzini:
> I'm trying to write some pascal code on a DOS env (FreeDOS 1.0). Is the IDE
> for this plataform mantained?! The command line compiler does run fine, but
> the IDE shows up and quickly disapears.
>
> Has anyone suffered this before?!!??
I don't k
I'm trying to write some pascal code on a DOS env (FreeDOS 1.0). Is the IDE
for this plataform mantained?! The command line compiler does run fine, but
the IDE shows up and quickly disapears.
Has anyone suffered this before?!!??
--
Daniel
"Let us change our traditional attitude to the construct
Yes! you only have to do fp from a terminal console.
Gaetano.
> The Windows version of FPC seems to have an IDE (fp.exe) of the
> traditional TP style. Does this also exist for Linux versions? After
> installing a Linux package, I can't find it anywhere.
>
> Angelo
>
>
> _
At 17:18 18-4-2005, you wrote:
The Windows version of FPC seems to have an IDE (fp.exe) of the
traditional TP style. Does this also exist for Linux versions? After
installing a Linux package, I can't find it anywhere.
The .tar.gz installation of 1.9.8 contains the IDE
Peter
The Windows version of FPC seems to have an IDE (fp.exe) of the
traditional TP style. Does this also exist for Linux versions? After
installing a Linux package, I can't find it anywhere.
Angelo
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.
49 matches
Mail list logo
