Koenraad Lelong schreef:
Martin Schreiber schreef:
On Sunday 19 February 2006 19.04, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Hi,
Today I did an update via svn. When I compiled for arm (in the hope that
the bug I encountered a while ago would have disappeared) I found a bug
in rtl/linux/arm/sysnr.inc :
Const
> Last time I checked SVN this seems solved (is it ? I modified my
> source-file which didn't get updated, so I renamed my source-file and
> then a new file appeared which contained the fix), but in 2.0.3 (of feb.
> 24) it is not.
> With 2.0.3 that error I mentioned does not appear, so I'm tryin
Martin Schreiber schreef:
On Sunday 19 February 2006 19.04, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Hi,
Today I did an update via svn. When I compiled for arm (in the hope that
the bug I encountered a while ago would have disappeared) I found a bug
in rtl/linux/arm/sysnr.inc :
Const
syscall_nr_base = syscall_n
Martin Schreiber schreef:
On Sunday 19 February 2006 19.04, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Hi,
Today I did an update via svn. When I compiled for arm (in the hope that
the bug I encountered a while ago would have disappeared) I found a bug
in rtl/linux/arm/sysnr.inc :
Const
syscall_nr_base = syscall_n
Hi,
Today I did an update via svn. When I compiled for arm (in the hope that
the bug I encountered a while ago would have disappeared) I found a bug
in rtl/linux/arm/sysnr.inc :
Const
syscall_nr_base = syscall_nr_base;
I modified this to :
Const
syscall_nr_base = $90;
which is similar to
