Koenraad Lelong schreef:
Martin Schreiber schreef:
On Sunday 19 February 2006 19.04, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Hi,
Today I did an update via svn. When I compiled for arm (in the hope that
the bug I encountered a while ago would have disappeared) I found a bug
in rtl/linux/arm/sysnr.inc :
Const
syscall_nr_base = syscall_nr_base;
I modified this to :
Const
syscall_nr_base = $900000;
which is similar to fpc 2.0.2.
...
I seem to have forgotten to add this to my previous mail :
Last time I checked SVN this seems solved (is it ? I modified my
source-file which didn't get updated, so I renamed my source-file and
then a new file appeared which contained the fix), but in 2.0.3 (of feb.
24) it is not.
Could this patch be applied on the 2.0.3 tree (I made it from the
fpcbuild-archive) ? If it's not right, could you please post
instructions how to do it right ?
Thanks,
Koenraad Lelong.
--- fpcsrc/rtl/linux/arm/sysnr.inc-org 2006-02-15 08:19:27.000000000 +0100
+++ fpcsrc/rtl/linux/arm/sysnr.inc 2006-03-06 13:25:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
}
Const
- syscall_nr_base = syscall_nr_base;
+ syscall_nr_base = $900000;
syscall_nr_exit = syscall_nr_base+ 1;
syscall_nr_fork = syscall_nr_base+ 2;
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
