Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> MPI is for passing messages between parallel running tasks. (the name
> means Message Passing Interface)
> This is what Active Objects does.
>
> To me, the difference seems that Active Objects runs within a single
> process, and MPI allows to run the tasks in different
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Werner Van Belle wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hello,
This looks promising.
Can you explain the similarities and differences with MPI ?
That would require me to read up on what MPI is and honoustly, I'm not a
big fan on doing that, certainly not after I went to their
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Hello,
> This looks promising.
>
> Can you explain the similarities and differences with MPI ?
That would require me to read up on what MPI is and honoustly, I'm not a
big fan on doing that, certainly not after I went to their homepage and
saw around 70 lines of contrib
Hello,
This looks promising.
Can you explain the similarities and differences with MPI ?
Several people have asked about MPI in Free Pascal. Maybe
this is an answer for them.
Michael.
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Werner Van Belle wrote:
Hello,
After the couple of questions I had about reference co
Hello,
After the couple of questions I had about reference counting and
cmpxchg, I can finally share what we have been working on, this would be
the eternal gratitude part. A freepascal implementation of active objects.
http://werner.yellowcouch.org/Papers/activeobjects/index.html
From the abstr
