The results may be sorted also by language name and so all C++ results
comes in before Pascal even if runtime is the same. Your program was as
fast as No1 but anyway not visible among top ten. This outrageous! ;-)
On 08/17/2017 10:21 AM, Ingemar Ragnemalm wrote:
A bit of news which I think h
Alright, its compiling! It was wrong path in fpc.cfg. The DEB
installation creates a directory structure under the fpc directory that
matches this:
/lib/fpc/3.1.1/units/$fpctarget
Thanks again!
On 08/16/2017 11:22 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, August 16, 2017 23:08, kapibara via fpc
To be sure fpc.cfg is found I started the compilation from fpc's bin
directory where the fpc.cfg is located.
roger@bikupan:~/fpc/fpc_svn/
bin$ ./fpc /home/roger/fpc/fptest_working/fptest.pas
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.1.1 [2017/08/16] for x86_64
Copyright (c) 1993-2015 by Florian Klaempfl an
mas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, August 16, 2017 22:16, kapibara via fpc-pascal wrote:
Ah, so FP has no versions other than the official releases then? (2.6.0,
2.6.2, 2.6.4 and so on)
Why doesn't FP use the same compiler revision as the SVN sources it
comes with? Because the fp executable is compile
You're right, now I fixed that and "which fpc" reports the SVN version!
On 08/16/2017 10:15 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, August 16, 2017 21:15, kapibara via fpc-pascal wrote:
I meant to say that system fpc is put AFTER the SVN fpc in the path.
Due to the missing slash at t
.pas
Btw, why have fpc and also ppcx64? Does fpc call ppcx64?
On 08/16/2017 09:45 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, kapibara via fpc-pascal said:
I want to use the fp editor to run the test, but it seems as the
"systemic" 2.6.4 is being used for compiling instea
I meant to say that system fpc is put AFTER the SVN fpc in the path.
On 08/16/2017 09:09 PM, kapibara wrote:
PATH=home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/bin:/home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/compiler:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
export
PATH=home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/bin:/home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/compiler:/usr/local/bin
For debugging reasons I have installed fpc 2.6.4 on Debian so I can
compile some old SVN revisions, number 32959 for example.
I want to use the fp editor to run the test, but it seems as the
"systemic" 2.6.4 is being used for compiling instead of the SVN version.
The bug doesn't show up in 2.6
Pereira Camara
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Sent: Sun, Jan 15, 2017 2:22 pm
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] PascalScript broken by FPC 3.0 ?
2017-01-14 21:44 GMT-03:00 Kapibara Pas :
Hi there,
What has happened? Is it possible to get it to work again without going back to
Lazarus 1.4 and fpc
Hi there,
The pascalscripts that worked fine with lazarus 1.4 and fpc 2.64 are crashing
when I try to run them in apps compiled with laz 1.6.2 or trunk.
I get a SIGSEG attempting to call the constructor of any class and suspect it
has to do with FPC version 3.0. Using latest fpc trunk didn't he
Hi all,
@Serguei Thanks for your reply. What you write is probably right, but
let me explain the problem.
In an application you have N number of threads and they all want to
access a service. Now, for example, only five threads are allowed to
have access at the same time. I believe this is a
Hi guys,
I'm thinking of starting a FPC/Lazarus course in my local area. It would
be interesting to know where you all think FPC (and Lazarus) is in 5-10
years?
Personally I think ObjectPascal is a great and productive language,
hence, I'd like to see it flourish. (C# simply reminds of my six
12 matches
Mail list logo
