Ah, so FP has no versions other than the official releases then? (2.6.0,
2.6.2, 2.6.4 and so on)
Why doesn't FP use the same compiler revision as the SVN sources it
comes with? Because the fp executable is compiled at the same time as fpc?
Alright then, I'll try instead:
fpc test.pas
Btw, why have fpc and also ppcx64? Does fpc call ppcx64?
On 08/16/2017 09:45 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, kapibara via fpc-pascal said:
I want to use the fp editor to run the test, but it seems as the
"systemic" 2.6.4 is being used for compiling instead of the SVN version.
Then you use a 2.6.4 FP. FP does not call the compiler, it has an own
version of it internally.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
