p://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/finalize.html
>
Not important, but there is a typo there: "necessaru"
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
__
now
I have an idea why.
Now what I should do is add {%H-} on each line containing blockread,
blockwrite, fillchar and so on... This isn't so difficult, after all. The
only drawback is that it could potentially hide another perfectly valid
warning.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l&#x
ate that the majority of the big web sites currently
don't store the passwords.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fp
2015-10-30 16:39 GMT+01:00 Jonas Maebe :
>
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote on Fri, 30 Oct 2015:
>
> Do you really need to compare them or simply to validate them? I ask
>> because in one project I worked on for an insurance company, we were
>> forbidden to store the password
2015-10-30 0:33 GMT+01:00 :
> On 10/29/2015 01:08 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
>> Good point. I'd even ask the question: do you really need to store the
>> passwords? IOW, do you want to be able to send them back to the user? Or
>> do
>> you only need to
http://www.wolfgang-ehrhardt.de/crchash_en.html
>
Good point. I'd even ask the question: do you really need to store the
passwords? IOW, do you want to be able to send them back to the user? Or do
you only need to check them?
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « pr
y. For example, in my GMail, it is called
"Insérer le texte sélectionné"
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
7;)+1
> Not sure which pascal its inherited from... but Delphi 7 does compile it
> too.
>
> I vaguely remember it seeing before once .. and ... a lot of time ago.
>
IIRC good old Turbo Pascal had this too.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « pr
ome unusable. This did happen quite frequently to me with Windows
XP 32 bits. I now use Windows 7 64 bits, and it hasn't happened to me
since, but I guess that's only because I haven't tried hard enough :-)
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(dav
n TP and Delphi), so if anything the only
> thing lacking is some minor documentation.
> Also please don't hijack threads.
>
I guess different communities have different rules, but I don't understand
(and I'd better understand if I don't want to do the same mistake): in
> produce a message (hint, warning or error, which may be configurated).
> > >
> > >
> > > is not it a way to make the "with" safe?
> >
> > How to get rid of the hint?
>
> Either get rid of the "with" or use a compiler directive to
2014-09-16 12:36 GMT+02:00 Frederic Da Vitoria :
> 2014-09-16 12:26 GMT+02:00 Philippe :
>
>> Em 16.09.2014 05:44, Frederic Da Vitoria escreveu:
>>
>> 2014-09-14 16:23 GMT+02:00 Mark Morgan Lloyd <
>> markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk>:
>>
>>
2014-09-16 12:26 GMT+02:00 Philippe :
> Em 16.09.2014 05:44, Frederic Da Vitoria escreveu:
>
> 2014-09-14 16:23 GMT+02:00 Mark Morgan Lloyd <
> markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk>:
>
>> I'd be far happier if there were provision for declaring a temporary
gt;begin
>shortcut.DirLogged := true;
>shortcut.DirHatFocus := false;
>shortcut.SubDirsExpanded := true;
>
Yes, something close to alias in SQL, instead of plain elision which "with"
currently performs. This would allow for a clearer writing w
tire thing to a memory stream, it would copy all of the
> data and every re-sort would go pretty slowly.
You are sorting only for display purposes? If so, maybe VirtualTreeView
could do the trick.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel
ch sort
order and systematically insert each item in all those collections. The
overhead would be in the initial loading, but then switching would be
instantaneous.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
2014-02-25 14:45 GMT+01:00 Frederic Da Vitoria :
> I should probably ask Google what is going on. I know: I don't have much
> chances of getting an answer.
>
I asked and I got an answer from Google, they were having issues with their
servers. No information about what issues,
idea of what is going on. IIUC, this is happening inside Google's systems.
Am I correct? If so, I should probably ask Google what is going on. I know:
I don't have much chances of getting an answer.
BTW, I don't know what the X-Received header means.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davi
2014-02-07 Michael Schnell :
> On 02/07/2014 10:18 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
>> Well, this should always be the behavior, not only for this mailing list.
>>
>
> In the era of facebook and twitter communication habits are bound to
> decline.
>
Of course,
> is there a way to get the informations posted ...
>
> and you did it (hijacked the same thread with another topic) again :/
>
>
>
> ___
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailma
>
Sadly at least some popular webmail clients (GMail) don't use Message-ID
either, so that the messages are in the order they were received instead of
the order of the answers and some answers are shown in a separate thread
because GMail thinks the subject has changed ("Re." is
eyOf
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/objects/tsortedcollection.keyof.html.
So IMO you should simply remove your implementation of KeyOf and edit
Compare so that it receives PTLERec and uses the relevant fields instead of
a simple string.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
gt; fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
_
n't understand the relation between cmd.exe and your program source. Do
you mean that you want to create a program which would open a cmd.exe
window and give it a title? Or do you want to run cmd manually and from
inside it run a program which would change the window's title? Or somethin
2014-02-06 waldo kitty :
> On 2/5/2014 3:57 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> [...]
>
> Once again I did not test this, but it seems to me that if Compare
>> returned -1
>> instead of 0, any duplicate would be inserted after because it would
>> never be
>> c
2014-02-05 waldo kitty :
> On 2/4/2014 5:16 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
>> 2014-02-04 waldo kitty > wkitt...@windstream.net>>:
>>
> [...]
>
> i kinda thought about that earlier when i was digging thru the
>> code... IIRC,
>> insert
re cases where the existing
> record needs to be replaced (because the new record is newer) using AtPut
> and the non-added records must be logged and their reason for not being
> added (older or same)...
Just a quick idea which could be completely wrong, but wouldn't it solve
y
I can imagine that the Delphi developers started from a routine to extract
words from texts, where several spaces between 2 words would count only as
one separator.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
__
sic is not a language I like, but still...
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
2013/12/17 Sven Barth
> On 17.12.2013 22:02, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
>> 2013/12/17 Sven Barth > <mailto:pascaldra...@googlemail.com>>
>>
>>
>> Am 17.12.2013 16:39 schrieb "Frederic Da Vitoria"
>> mailto
2013/12/17 Sven Barth
> Am 17.12.2013 16:39 schrieb "Frederic Da Vitoria" :
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > In the following program, I get a runtime error I don't understand. This
> is a stripped down version of the code. This was written in Delphi
Form1.FormInit (Sender: TObject);
begin
DisplayForm ;
end;
procedure TForm1.btn_NewClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
DisplayForm ;
end;
begin
b_Lines := 3 ;
b_Columns := 4 ;
end.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre
2013/11/13 Sven Barth
> Am 13.11.2013 11:07, schrieb Frederic Da Vitoria:
>
> 2013/11/13 Rainer Stratmann
>
>> On Wednesday 13 November 2013 10:52:23 you wrote:
>> > 2013/11/13 Rainer Stratmann
>> > > Is there a description of the behaviour of const
7;s probably how Move is written: in assembly language. Of
course, since the types were not given in the parameter declaration of
Move, the compiler can't know the size of the data, and you have to give
the compiler some indication. That's what "count" is for. Move considers
the
it is declared
as "const"
"dest" is where the data is copied to, so the procedure will necessarily
modify it (if "count" is <> 0), and the procedure should modify so it is
declared as "var". Actually, IMO it could be declared as "out", t
2013/10/31 Sven Barth
> Am 31.10.2013 14:42, schrieb Frederic Da Vitoria:
>
> 2013/10/31 Sven Barth
>
>> Am 31.10.2013 12:38, schrieb Frederic Da Vitoria:
>>
>> 2013/10/31 Sven Barth
>>
>>> Am 31.10.2013 02:45, schrieb Xiangrong Fang:
>>
2013/10/31 waldo kitty
> On 10/31/2013 7:38 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
>> But is this really good? Doesn't this contradict the Pascal
>> philosophy? Borland did a few questionable things (look at how you used
>> the
>> semicolons in you examples above
2013/10/31 Sven Barth
> Am 31.10.2013 12:38, schrieb Frederic Da Vitoria:
>
> 2013/10/31 Sven Barth
>
>> Am 31.10.2013 02:45, schrieb Xiangrong Fang:
>>
>> 2013/10/30 Jonas Maebe
>>
>>>
>>> This is not equivalent. A private type de
#x27;t be an error here
> SomeTest.Test;
> end.
>
> === program ===
>
> It's this way at least since Turbo Pascal (though without classes then ;)
> ).
>
Yes, I agree this is the TP/Delphi way, and as such should be kept at least
in DELPHI mode. But is this really g
t; problem to use it. It's of course not exactly the same (tdynarray isn't
> declared as private to u1), but at the scope visibility level it is the
> same situation as far as I am concerned.
>
Precisely, shouldn't this trigger an error too? The code s
ow the merits of exploring thoroughly the limits of a problem before
committing code which could later place you in such a conflicting situation
(I am not throwing stones to the developer who committed this function
first, I have too often done the same mistake myself)
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(da
ter years (i.e.
> Bart's example of bigger numbers).
> In other words, the system of Roman numerals was not fixed; it changed
> over time, it was mostly based on conventions that fell short of actual
> rules.
>
You are probably right: see
http://www.web40571.clarahos
re indeed ambiguous (M) So that we maybe could accept unambiguous
invalid combinations, but I don't see how to accept ambiguous ones.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
still requires you to
> write code.
>
> For the more general case where you can have arrays, classes, interfaces
> and whatnot as fields of your object, there is simply no correct way.
>
Isn't there? Maybe it wouldn't be easy, but IIRC Delphi offers something
related to this with TComponents and Streams. This Delphi mechanism I knew
worked only for properties, but I found references that there existed a
wider mechanism in D2010.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
t;a,b,c: string;
> end;
> private
>F: TMyClassVars;
> public
>procedure Assign(Source: TPersistent);
>property a: string read F.a write F.a;
> end;
>
> procedure TMyClass.Assign(Source: TPersistent);
> begin
> F:=TMyClass(Source).F;
> inhe
hat you are using TP objects)
A little bit below the citation in your first post, you'll find this: "A
constructor/destructor pair is required if the object uses virtual methods.
The reason is that for an object with virtual methods, some internal
housekeeping must be done: this houseke
lt; < <> <= and <=
But your splitter must be able to know when it is inside a string (no
splitting) and outside. Which means your splitter should be able to
recognize the right quote too and split after it if suitable.
--
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)
Membre de
47 matches
Mail list logo
