2014-03-12 21:56 GMT+01:00 Jim Leonard <trix...@oldskool.org>: > On 3/12/2014 2:30 PM, Philippe wrote: > >> Type >> TMethod = ( method_type_1, method_type_2, method_type_3); >> > > Ah, clever -- create a Compare that switches based on what I tell it to > do. I like that, but as far as I can tell there's no way to tell a > TSortedCollection to "resort" -- it's kept sorted only through inserts and > deletes. >
You (or the user) will never need to resotre the first order? I am asking because you could as well simply create one SortedCollection for each sort order and systematically insert each item in all those collections. The overhead would be in the initial loading, but then switching would be instantaneous. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
