When i create an library template with Lazarus, dont save it and build
it then an libproject1.so is created as expected in /tmp. Wen i save the
same project and rebuild it, an project1 executable is created.
with fpc 2.0.4 this creates always an lib as expected.
anybody an idea ? is this an bug
Very few OOP is used in the Pascal implementations, so Pascal and C are on
equal grounds here.
musnt the memory manager included if only few oo stuff is included ?
why g++ is soo mutch slower than gcc if so few oo stuff is used ??
pure c is no higher level laguage for me. asm is not soo mut
NO: C gcc has the first Place C is not Object oriented, FPC is Object
oriented.
And g++ is behind fpc.
regards
Christian
Bisma Jayadi schrieb:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all&xfullcpu=1&xmem=1&xloc=0&binarytrees=1&chameneos=1&message=1&fannkuch=1&fasta=1&kn
Yes, you can i have an mpx220 and have tryed this already.
Only the LCL is not completely useable couse some canvas routines Crash
on Wince < 5.0
regards
Christian
Pianoman schrieb:
Hello, I would like to ask whether is it possible to use freepascal to
write application for example for Motoro
> Having such a page is not bad but I consider it more as something which
> can be done by the power users instead of the developers. If something
> serious is started, I'll link it to the main page.
right, but i think the "power users" read this list so i hope tht they will
help stay tuned with a
> If you want tested revisions use the releases. For trunk you are on
> your own to keep track of working revisions. Maybe for you rev A is
> good, but broken on an other platform where rev B is better.
Not all realeases are stable,i have used fpc 2.0.4 for 2 days and then used
fpc 2.1.1
because f
> > If you want a 'stable' trunk stick with r5191 for now.
>
> .. but don't use smart-linking (-XX) then.
>
> better use r5180 ..
ok, i havend belived this but seems to be an compiler issue maybe the ppu
check code is broken in revisions >5191 or something else
with 5180 everything seems to build
> > My Path is set to %PATH%;d:\programme\lazarus\fpc\bin\i386-win32
> > When it woud be so easy i woudnt write to this list
>
> Sorry for trying to help...
dont be worry please, maybe ive writed a little bit hard.
iam glad that you all try to help.
>
>
> Jonas
> __
M
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling problems
> Christian Ulrich schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have compiled an fpc with revision 5198 bevore 5 minutes for
> > i386-win32 and arm-wince
> > compiles great. (Actual revisions dont compile)
>
> There is h
s..
Havend copied all units from source\fcl\units to units\fcl
and from source\packages\base\paszlib to units\paszlib
the same problem. can nobody confirm this ?
>
>
> Christian Ulrich wrote:
> >> I think you forgot to compile FCL too. You only compiled the compiler
&
.
Thats not for wince thats for WIN32 so maybe someone schould take a look at
the makefiles or not ?!
But as i see zstream.ppu and .o and also paszlib.ppu and .o are there
>
>
> Christian Ulrich wrote:
> >> I think you forgot to compile FCL too. You only compiled the compiler
&
> But did it install into D:\Programme\lazarus\fpc\2.1.1\ ?
YES of course have deleted the old stuff except the bintools and copied
everything from d:\pp to d:\programme\lazarus\fpc
> And does this invocation of "make" use the newly compiled compiler?
My Path is set to %PATH%;d:\programme\lazaru
I think you forgot to compile FCL too. You only compiled the compiler and
RTL.
Instructions here:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/WinCE_port#Building_FPC_libraries
NO !
please read:
PPU Loading D:\Programme\lazarus\fpc\2.1.1\units\i386-win32\fcl\zstream.ppu
Recompiling zstream, che
Hi,
I have compiled an fpc with revision 5198 bevore 5 minutes for i386-win32
and arm-wince
compiles great. (Actual revisions dont compile)
When i try to rebuild Lazarus or just the lcl for Wince it says:
PPU Loading D:\Programme\lazarus\fpc\2.1.1\units\i386-win32\fcl\zstream.ppu
Recompiling
14 matches
Mail list logo
