On 11/1/05, L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think there isa unicode version of synedit and it probably wouldn't take
> too much work to
> get it working for freepascal
>
> "Unicode Version: Actually into CVS there is available a UNICODE Version of
> synedit,
> snapshots are available here"
On 11/1/05, L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The internet uses english as the standard language. That is why I use it. If
> it is proven
> that some other language should be used as the internet language, then I will
> use it. I do
> enjoy the upside down question marks in spanish, as they help
On 11/1/05, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, sorry, I replied to the wrong message, I was trying to get a
> response from Agustin, not necessarily from you; he did make the Eclipse
> comparison, and he said he liked that IDE better for OO stuff. But maybe
> that's because the unicod
On 10/31/05, Team Z505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have to tried translation tools? I have converted many Russian source code
> help files from
> the KOL project into English using PROMT translator online. Once in a while
> you get a funny
> translation like "I hit the code twice before she comp
On 10/31/05, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The cool thing about fpc and lazarus is that you can fix things yourself.
> Don't forget that we don't get paid and do it all in our spare free time.
>
If Lazarus was written in Java or Smalltalk, I might be able to help
out. But given that
On 10/31/05, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
>
> > Elio Cuevas Gómez wrote:
> >
> >> These are all good things, but if the IDE editor can't handle basic
> >> stuff like international characters it's not very useful.
> >
> >
> > For you. It is useful for most of
On 10/30/05, L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I solved the problem using a single-rooted wrapper hierarchy (java
> > > style). It's not elegant nor efficient,
>
> Google.com
>
> Your search - "single-rooted wrapper hierarchy" - did not match any documents.
>
Let's say you need a general pur
On 10/30/05, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If Variants could store objects and interface instances, maybe.
>
> They can? Simply use custom variants.
>
Don't know what custom variants are. I'd appreciate a link to the documentation.
> > I solved the problem using a single-rooted
On 10/30/05, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agustin Barto wrote:
> > I was talking about design. One example? Polymorphism with primitive
> > data types can get really messy really fast with ObjectPascal. It's
> > not easy, for instance, to have a
On 10/30/05, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK this is a gtk only problem and has already being submited as a
> bug report (by me). It works perfectly on Windows. And the problem is
> only related to the IDE. TEdit (and programs that use it) can handle
> accented words
On 10/30/05, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Witch unicode? UTF-8 obviously works on Lazarus as the editor produces
> and reads files in this format. I have also worked with lazarus and
> XML files, witch are normally in UTF-8.
I can't type any international characters (
On 10/30/05, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please give objective reasons to back up your statement that Lazarus
> is a bad IDE (and test the latest stable one to see if the problems
> were not fixed).
>
a) Unicode didn't work for me on any (including the lastest) versi
On 10/30/05, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But those are reasons to mix the projects (not in code)! From Systems
> we can know that many people are not using FPC because they need a
> good gui IDE.
Errr...Lazarus is a good IDE/RAD? It certainly is a good start, but is
On 10/29/05, David Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - other reasons?
>
Here are the reasons why I don't use Lazarus regularly (I use
FreePascal almost every day):
- The "compiler mismatch" of Lazarus. Most of the time lazarus
requires a version of fpc that's not the current stable version.
-
When I try to compile a unit in delphi mode with the following function
function Implements(out AReference; const AObject: TObject; const
AInterface: TGUID): Boolean;
begin
Result := (AObject is TInterfacedObject) and
((AObject as TInterfacedObject).QueryInterface(AInterface, AReference) = 0
I have to build some container classes (like java Vector) for a
project. I was thinking on how to store some primitive values (so far
I only need to store Integer, Real or Extended and ShortString) and I
can't decide between variants (variant arrays) and variant records
(dynamic arrays of variant r
I have a class that has a TObject field. In some of the instances of
this class the field will contain an objetct from a class that
implements certain interface. What can I do to check if the referenced
object implements the interface?
___
fpc-pascal mai
I'd like to use some scientific/math librearies like LAPACK and
GNU/GSL with fpc. I already know about h2pas and external subroutines
and variables, but I wanted to know if these methods will be able to
deal with libraries as complex as LAPACK (clapack obviously) and GSL.
I'm porting my graduate t
I'm trying to build the fpc 1.9.8 from the srpm and I get the
following error message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmbuild --rebuild --clean fpc-1.9.8-0.src.rpm
Installing fpc-1.9.8-0.src.rpm
error: File
/home/michael/fpc/previous/buildsrc/fpc/build/rpm/SOURCES/fpc-1.9.8-src.tar.gz:
No such file or di
I'm looking for a free report generator that can work with Delphi and
FPC. Any recommendations?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:05:50 +0100, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2 mrt 2005, at 07:29, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> > - FPC's random is probably more complex
>
> Indeed. I guess Delphi's is still a simple "(x * prime1) mod prime2" or
> so. FPC uses the Mersenne twister.
>
> Jonas
I ran some test of serveral Extended matrix internal representations
to implement on an adaptation of Jedi_Math's matrix code (already
contributed some of this modifications). In the attached file you'll
see one of these tests. I have some questions about the results:
* The performance of the thre
, 10 Dec 2004 12:08:13 -0300, Agustin Barto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a little more testing, and the console based apps fail too, with
> the same access violation exception.
>
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists
I did a little more testing, and the console based apps fail too, with
the same access violation exception.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
I integrated the generated parser and libs with the old code and now I
get a lot of run-time errors. I traced some of them to lexlib's
assigns of the default input and ouput so I commented out those (It's
a GUI app anyway). But then I started to get access violations. What
puzzles me is that my con
After some work I was able to translate my parser's grammar from
Coco/R to Lex/Yacc. It wasn't easy and I hate to loose the more
"functional" aspects of Coco/R, but at least my project can compile
both on Windows (with Delphi) and Linux (with fpc) (at least the
non-UI parts).
When I started to mod
I tried to compile tply with fpc-1.9.5, and I got an error about
memAvail not being avaible. A quick googling and I found out about
GetHeapStatus. A little more googling and I discovered that the
fpc-1.9.5 version of tply doesn't have the problem (thanks for that
btw).
It'll be cool if this versio
Turbo Pascal version of Coco/R compiles ok. I don't remember needing
any tweaking at all (besides from unzipping the distributions with all
the filenames on lowecase).
I was wondering if the lex/yacc version that comes with fpc is the
same as the one from
http://www.musikwissenschaft.uni-mainz.de
I had some problems with exec_shield and compilers (and intepreters)
in the past.
Anyway, I'm just happy to have fpc working again :)
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:20:20 +0100, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4 dec 2004, at 19:18, Agustin Barto wrote:
>
> > I di
I disabled exec_shield (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec_shield) and it
worked. I tried several times to check and everytime I had exec_shield
on, the compile process got to an error at some point. I guess it does
affect the compiler, or at least it does on my particular
configuration.
Agustin
On S
I'm trying to rebuild the srpms of fpc 1.0.10 and 1.9.4 and I'm
getting "Internal Error " randomly during the compile process.
I'm running FC3 on an AMD Athlon 2600+. I'm guessing it has something
to do with the distro, 'cause it used to work on FC2.
__
I'm looking for a good free (as in speech) parser generator for
FreePascal. Right now I'm working with Coco/R (from
http://www.tetzel.com/CocoR/) and I'm not very pleased with this tool.
The generated code works perfect with fpc-1.9.4 but the (parser)
compiler only works on Windows and I want my pr
> Any recommendations on a good book for my context?
I was a seasoned Java and C++ programmer when I was giving the task of
implementing a very complex algorithm with Delphi. I left the Windows
world years ago so I always had in mind developing on Delphi but
keeping most of the code as FPC compati
I have FC2 (with prelinking and exec-shield enabled) and the programs
work just fine. I'm using fpc-1.9.4.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:57:21 +0200 (CEST), Marco van de Voort
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fedora core II. My programs seem to take over the whole screen and
> > when they finish the system
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 11:51:41 -0500, Ken Linder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO, Kylix was before its time a bit. I was at BORCON last year and there
> were quite a few people interested in it being ressurected. No, it has not
> been abandoned, luckily. Borland is just holding onto it for rig
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:24:35 +0200, Harald Houppermans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I doubt you know what happens "under the hood" of free pascal.
>
That's not the point.
> Also I believe the free pascal source code is fully available so you might
> look at specific parts ;)
That's the point
1) Using proprietary software to build scientific applications (like
in my case) is just wrong. You never know what there might be
happening "under the hood". And you are bound to licenses and EULAS
that are designed to avoid any kind of responsability of the software
maker.
2) There is a Delphi p
>
> Jedi math hardly has a math dependancy, at least the last time I looked,
> it worked with FPC 1.9.x in a few minutes. (on FreeBSD)
>
> I even got the _visual_ part to work with Lazarus, but that was more an
> empty form.
Although I had a lot of success working with FreePascal, I can't say
th
]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Agustin Barto wrote:
>
> > I'm developing a statistical software and I need a mathematical
> > (algebra) unit for FreePascal. Right now I'm using Jedi_Math with
> > Delphi but I don't want the VLC/CLX dependency an
I'm developing a statistical software and I need a mathematical
(algebra) unit for FreePascal. Right now I'm using Jedi_Math with
Delphi but I don't want the VLC/CLX dependency and I hate using
proprietary software (Delphi or Kylix). If the unit is
object-oriented, even better.
Thanks to the last
40 matches
Mail list logo
