Thank you for all your detailed answers. I read information about
lazbuild, but I think using Lazarus is much more easier. Since I am
used to vim, it might cost me some time to get familiar with it.
Thanks again.
2009/10/27 Mattias Gaertner :
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:55:03 +0200
> Graeme Geldenhu
2009/10/27 Alexander Grau :
> 章宏九 schrieb:
>>
>> On the page (http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Qt_Interface), I read
>> "To compile a project for Qt just select it as the target widgetset on
>> the Compiler Options dialog." However, I am using vim instead of
On the page (http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Qt_Interface), I read
"To compile a project for Qt just select it as the target widgetset on
the Compiler Options dialog." However, I am using vim instead of
Lazarus IDE. How should I set the compiler options in the command
line? I would also like to
Hmm, currently I am also learning Oberon.
No any language requires an IDE. I use vim. Others might use emacs.
These are enough. What we need is a simple editor (if you like, GNU
nano or simply "cat > 1.pas" is okay) and a compiler. They can make
the world, although not that efficiently.
Not the b
I see. That means if no tag name is given, I should make sure my code
is correct by myself.
Thank you.
2009/10/7 Anton Tichawa :
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 23:37 +0800, 章宏九 wrote:
>> Thank you. I saw all the examples you gave, but I still cannot master
>> how to use a variant r
Thank you for your detailed information.
2009/10/6 Marco van de Voort :
> In our previous episode, 章宏九 said:
>> I notice that in early 1977, BSD contains a Pascal interpreter (or
>> maybe compiler, I am not sure). How was it later? Is there any remain
>> archives?
>
&g
I notice that in early 1977, BSD contains a Pascal interpreter (or
maybe compiler, I am not sure). How was it later? Is there any remain
archives?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc
Thank you. I saw all the examples you gave, but I still cannot master
how to use a variant record without a specified tag.
For example:
type
TShapeList = (Rectangle, Triangle, Circle, Ellipse, Other);
TFigure = record
case TShapeList of
Rectangle: (Height, Width: Real);
Triangl
In the document
(http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu15.html#x38-450003.3.2)
I read the code below:
Type
MyRec = Record
X : Longint;
Case byte of
2 : (Y : Longint;
case byte of
3 : (Z : Longint);
);
About C++ to C, you can see Sun developer's paper: Mixing C and C++
Code in the same program
(http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/mixing.html). Very
detailed and useful.
2009/10/5 Marco van de Voort :
> In our previous episode, Gilles MARCOU said:
>> I believe that using C++ objects directl
Thank you very much.
2009/9/24 Jonas Maebe :
>
> On 24 Sep 2009, at 10:53, 章宏九 wrote:
>
>> 2009/9/24 Jonas Maebe :
>>>
>>>> I would like also to know the situation in C. (I mean
>>>> declaration of printf and scanf. Are they implemented in glibc or
2009/9/24 Jonas Maebe :
>
> On 24 Sep 2009, at 10:31, 章宏九 wrote:
>
>> I just tried to unfairly compare fpc-compiled binary and gcc-compiled
>> binary under my Gentoo box. FPC is incredible. `ps` data shows the fpc
>> one costs nearly no memory?
>
> The FPC run ti
Hi.
I just tried to unfairly compare fpc-compiled binary and gcc-compiled
binary under my Gentoo box. FPC is incredible. `ps` data shows the fpc
one costs nearly no memory? But I still notice it is a little slow. It
usually costs 0.5~1.0 time more than the gcc one. It seems as if fpc
saves memory
13 matches
Mail list logo
