Re: [fpc-pascal] Proposal for new Free Pascal logo

2018-04-05 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Mr Bee via fpc-pascal wrote: Yes. For me, this is the direction to go in. But it's Lazarus logo. I think we should have a distinguished logo between the compiler and the IDE. I didn't say you need to copy it. I just think that it is minimalistic, yet still recognizable

Re: [fpc-pascal] Proposal for new Free Pascal logo

2018-04-05 Thread Mr Bee via fpc-pascal
2018-04-04 16:58 GMT+07:00 Michael Van Canneyt : > >> Do you mean this: >> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/File:Lazarus-icons-lpr- >> proposal-bpsoftware.png >> ? >> > > Yes. For me, this is the direction to go in. But it's Lazarus logo. I think we should have a distinguished logo between the

Re: [fpc-pascal] 0030208: "not" doesn't work properly on bitpacked booleans

2018-04-05 Thread wkitty42
On 04/05/2018 02:11 PM, Luca Olivetti wrote: El 03/04/18 a les 13:14, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: I was going to report a bug but I see it's already fixed https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30208 however it's still there in 3.0.4, released a year and a half later than the fix. Will the fix be

Re: [fpc-pascal] 0030208: "not" doesn't work properly on bitpacked booleans

2018-04-05 Thread Luca Olivetti
El 03/04/18 a les 13:14, Luca Olivetti ha escrit: I was going to report a bug but I see it's already fixed https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30208 however it's still there in 3.0.4, released a year and a half later than the fix. Will the fix be backported/merged to the next 3.0.6? For the