On 08/16/2017 04:27 PM, Ched wrote:
Dear FPCers,
Would it be not too hard to make fp.ini and fp.cfg containing sections dedicated
to one OS (bot read by others, but kept untouched) ? I'm working on my source
codes both under Linux and under Windows ; when switching from one to the other,
the
Alright, its compiling! It was wrong path in fpc.cfg. The DEB
installation creates a directory structure under the fpc directory that
matches this:
/lib/fpc/3.1.1/units/$fpctarget
Thanks again!
On 08/16/2017 11:22 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, August 16, 2017 23:08, kapibara via fpc-pascal
To be sure fpc.cfg is found I started the compilation from fpc's bin
directory where the fpc.cfg is located.
roger@bikupan:~/fpc/fpc_svn/
bin$ ./fpc /home/roger/fpc/fptest_working/fptest.pas
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.1.1 [2017/08/16] for x86_64
Copyright (c) 1993-2015 by Florian Klaempfl an
On Wed, August 16, 2017 23:08, kapibara via fpc-pascal wrote:
> The old SVN version is now in play, so far so good! But then "Can't find
> unit system" happened:
You need RTL (and other required units, e.g. from packages) compiled with
that compiler version and provide path to it either using fpc.
The old SVN version is now in play, so far so good! But then "Can't find
unit system" happened:
roger@bikupan:~/fpc/fptest_working$ fpc fptest.pas
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.1.1 [2017/08/16] for x86_64
Copyright (c) 1993-2015 by Florian Klaempfl and others
Target OS: Linux for x86-64
Compili
You're right, now I fixed that and "which fpc" reports the SVN version!
On 08/16/2017 10:15 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, August 16, 2017 21:15, kapibara via fpc-pascal wrote:
I meant to say that system fpc is put AFTER the SVN fpc in the path.
Due to the missing slash at the beginning of th
On Wed, August 16, 2017 22:16, kapibara via fpc-pascal wrote:
> Ah, so FP has no versions other than the official releases then? (2.6.0,
> 2.6.2, 2.6.4 and so on)
>
> Why doesn't FP use the same compiler revision as the SVN sources it
> comes with? Because the fp executable is compiled at the same
Dear FPCers,
Would it be not too hard to make fp.ini and fp.cfg containing sections dedicated to one OS (bot read by
others, but kept untouched) ? I'm working on my source codes both under Linux and under Windows ; when
switching from one to the other, the files are slightly corrupted and shoul
On Wed, August 16, 2017 21:15, kapibara via fpc-pascal wrote:
> I meant to say that system fpc is put AFTER the SVN fpc in the path.
Due to the missing slash at the beginning of the PATH value? ;-)
Obviously, that only answers the reason of the 'which fpc' command,
whereas the compiler version use
Ah, so FP has no versions other than the official releases then? (2.6.0,
2.6.2, 2.6.4 and so on)
Why doesn't FP use the same compiler revision as the SVN sources it
comes with? Because the fp executable is compiled at the same time as fpc?
Alright then, I'll try instead:
fpc test.pas
Btw,
In our previous episode, kapibara via fpc-pascal said:
>
> I want to use the fp editor to run the test, but it seems as the
> "systemic" 2.6.4 is being used for compiling instead of the SVN version.
Then you use a 2.6.4 FP. FP does not call the compiler, it has an own
version of it internally.
I meant to say that system fpc is put AFTER the SVN fpc in the path.
On 08/16/2017 09:09 PM, kapibara wrote:
PATH=home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/bin:/home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/compiler:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
export
PATH=home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/bin:/home/roger/fpc/fpc_svn/compiler:/usr/local/bin:/us
For debugging reasons I have installed fpc 2.6.4 on Debian so I can
compile some old SVN revisions, number 32959 for example.
I want to use the fp editor to run the test, but it seems as the
"systemic" 2.6.4 is being used for compiling instead of the SVN version.
The bug doesn't show up in 2.6
On 2017-08-16 18:14, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Wrong. Take an empty program that includes the X unit:
In private I emailed Fred the following URL - it explains in plain
English what is required and what really happens in the ELF binary
format and such. Fred finally understood. On a sid
On 14.08.2017 15:19, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> A concrete example.
>
> A Linux/FreeBSD fpc release was compiled using the pascal headers for
> libX11.so.6 and using symlink libX11.so >> libX11.so.6.0.8.
>
> This release was installed on a system (with libX11-dev too to make it
> work).
>
> If, s
Hi,
very stupid defaults indeed.
I just had a bug last week, because I was using TStringList as map and
forgot to change it to case-sensitive
Cheers,
Benito
Am 16.08.2017 um 15:48 schrieb Gabor Boros:
2017. 08. 16. 15:21 keltezéssel, Michael Van Canneyt írta:
Because the quotes must be
On 2017-08-16 14:48, Gabor Boros wrote:
SL2.QuoteChar:=#0; solved my problem. But strange if the TStringList
think from a starting " the string is quoted. For example if data.cvs
contains "abc|89|0 I got the next result with my example program
(without QuoteChar trick): 0 * abc|89|0
Try using t
2017. 08. 16. 15:21 keltezéssel, Michael Van Canneyt írta:
Because the quotes must be the first and last character of each string
(or "cell").
As noted in another reply, set the quote character to something unused, and
it will disable (or circumvent) quoting altogether.
SL2.QuoteChar:=#0; sol
2017. 08. 16. 15:15 keltezéssel, Kevin Jesshope írta:
Setting the quotechar to something impossible (linefeed, #0 etc) stops
the quote processing.
SL2.QuoteChar:=#0; solved my problem. Thank you!
Gabor
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.fre
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Gabor Boros wrote:
Hi All,
With the attached example program and data.csv I got the next result:
0 * 84392
1 * asfds
2 * hytr
3 * 43421454
4 * O
5 * fdsfds
6 * 654645645 "O" fdsfsd
7 * hgfgfedw
8 * fg
9 * 321.544
10 * 89
11 * 0
"O" fdsfds - broken into two parts which
Setting the quotechar to something impossible (linefeed, #0 etc) stops the
quote processing.
SL2.QuoteChar:=#10;
results in
0 * 84392
1 * asfds
2 * hytr
3 * 43421454
4 * "O" fdsfds
5 * 654645645 "O" fdsfsd
6 * hgfgfedw
7 * fg
8 * 321.544
9 * 89
10 * 0
Regards
Kevin Jesshope - In Touch Com
Hi All,
With the attached example program and data.csv I got the next result:
0 * 84392
1 * asfds
2 * hytr
3 * 43421454
4 * O
5 * fdsfds
6 * 654645645 "O" fdsfsd
7 * hgfgfedw
8 * fg
9 * 321.544
10 * 89
11 * 0
"O" fdsfds - broken into two parts which is bad from my POV. See 4 * O
and 5 * fds
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-07-25 09:54, Bo Berglund wrote:
buffer in an old application, so I need to write efficient
replacements for certain string functions (Delete, Insert, Copy etc).
Now I am wondering if there is a better way to do the Insert() command
than t
On 2017-07-25 09:54, Bo Berglund wrote:
buffer in an old application, so I need to write efficient
replacements for certain string functions (Delete, Insert, Copy etc).
Now I am wondering if there is a better way to do the Insert() command
than this:
Reading that... All I can think of is the
24 matches
Mail list logo
