On 10/17/2016 7:47 PM, fredvs wrote:
@fpc-team: Why not register the concept of "smart-linking", nobody knows
that word in other language.
IMO, it would be good to add in wikipedia a article about "smartlink" and
not forget to say that the concept of "smart-linking" comes from fpc.
Well, it does
On 10/17/2016 10:47 PM, fredvs wrote:
@fpc-team: Why not register the concept of "smart-linking", nobody knows
that word in other language.
IMO, it would be good to add in wikipedia a article about "smartlink" and
not forget to say that the concept of "smart-linking" comes from fpc.
it does not
Oops, I did not see this...
> Is only Smart-Linking causing the problem?
Yes I agree it is only a detail, all the rest is working perfectly.
And I will survive, even with smart-link 32 bit not working in one of my
system. ;-)
Thanks a lot for helping.
@fpc-team: Why not register the concep
> Just curious. If you don't compile with Smart-Linking enabled, does your
binary then run fine?
Yes, without Smart-linking, a 32 bit fpc application runs fine in a
multi-arch 64 bit system.
With Smart-linking a 32 bit application runs fine only in a mono-arch 32
bit.
Fred.
-
Many thanks
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, David Emerson wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
David Emerson wrote:
Can the 3.1.1 documentation be viewed as html on the website? where?
No.
The 3.0.0 version is easy to find... but I'd like to see the one under
development
It is not under development.
I only doc
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
David Emerson wrote:
Can the 3.1.1 documentation be viewed as html on the website? where?
No.
The 3.0.0 version is easy to find... but I'd like to see the one under
development
It is not under development.
I only document released material.
I guess I should ha
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, David Emerson wrote:
Can the 3.1.1 documentation be viewed as html on the website? where?
No.
The 3.0.0 version is easy to find... but I'd like to see the one under
development
It is not under development.
I only document released material.
Michael.
__
Can the 3.1.1 documentation be viewed as html on the website? where?
The 3.0.0 version is easy to find... but I'd like to see the one under
development
Thanks!
David.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepasc
I was thinking: pipes are useful to communicate between processes. How
about a high level communication system instead of just sending low level
strings over the pipe? For example strong typing. If you want to send an
integer over a pipe, you generally have to parse the string and ensure it
is a nu
Am 17.10.2016 17:11 schrieb "Martin Schreiber" :
>
> On Monday 17 October 2016 15:30:36 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > On 2016-10-17 13:55, fredvs wrote:
> > > So it seems that garbage collection must be enabled to do a smartlink.
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow you. From what I understand from the FPC
On 10/17/16, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
> Is there a way to know what encoding was used at a string?
>
> My system are receiving some files and I don't know the encoding.
> I would like to know and then, convert it.
As explained there is no certain way.
Lazarus comes with lconvencoding unit
On 10/17/16, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> When clicking on the "Free Pascal Community" link it times out:
> http://community.freepascal.org:1/
Posted to lazarus-dev ML and when I got no reply reported on Mantis in
january 2016.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29452
Bart
___
On 10/17/16, grouchysmurf wrote:
>> Why a hack?
>> System.ExitCode is meant for returning exitcodes.
>
> Being forced to forfeit one or two layers of abstraction in an object
> oriented environment does sound like a hack to me. A direct access to
> system variables is inelegant to my unexperienc
On 2016-10-17 17:28, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi,
On the bug tracker login page
http://mantis.freepascal.org/login_page.php?return=%2Fmy_view_page.php%3F
I see this text:
Do you already have a login at Free Pascal Community? You can use that
login here (use your e-mail address as username).
Wh
Hi,
On the bug tracker login page
http://mantis.freepascal.org/login_page.php?return=%2Fmy_view_page.php%3F
I see this text:
Do you already have a login at Free Pascal Community? You can use that
login here (use your e-mail address as username).
When clicking on the "Free Pascal Community" link
On Monday 17 October 2016 15:30:36 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2016-10-17 13:55, fredvs wrote:
> > So it seems that garbage collection must be enabled to do a smartlink.
>
> I'm not sure I follow you. From what I understand from the FPC
> documentation, is that FPC (when smartlinking is enabled)
On 2016-09-21 18:07, fredvs wrote:
> In a multi-arch system (64 bit system that can run 32 bit apps too) FreeBSD
> 64, there is problem if a fpc 32 bit application was compiled with smart
> link (-XX).
Just curious. If you don't compile with Smart-Linking enabled, does your
binary then run fine?
Yeh, the cavalry finally arrives, I am saved. ;-)
> it is then the linkers job to link only the object files that are needed
> (and really used in the application) to make the executable.
Yes, yes, yes and re-yes.
> I guess showing them the content of the ppas.sh file is all that they
> should
On 2016-10-17 13:55, fredvs wrote:
> So it seems that garbage collection must be enabled to do a smartlink.
I'm not sure I follow you. From what I understand from the FPC
documentation, is that FPC (when smartlinking is enabled) generates
multiple object files per unit, trying to make a object fil
On 2016-10-17 14:14, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
> My system are receiving some files and I don't know the encoding.
> I would like to know and then, convert it.
No such function [with exact results] exists anywhere (no matter the
programming language). The best programs can do is to interroga
Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
> Is there a way to know what encoding was used at a string?
>
> My system are receiving some files and I don't know the encoding.
> I would like to know and then, convert it.
There are some heuristics you could try to apply (see e.g.
http://chsdet.sourceforge.net
Hi,
Is there a way to know what encoding was used at a string?
My system are receiving some files and I don't know the encoding.
I would like to know and then, convert it.
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepa
Thanks Michael.
> No, simply probably no-one knows the answer or the few knowledgable people
> didn't see your message.
OK I agree the problem is complicated it is the reason why I ask this to fpc
+ freebsd forum.
But here I ask something simple : What option is added to linker when -XX
paramet
Luiz Gonzaga de Oliveira Neto wrote:
> Would be it be better to try to compile this with the Turbo Pascal
> compiler then? Or do you think it would be easier to try to remove the
> lines with these codes and continue with FPC? My fear is that in some of
> these modifications I change what the code
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Luiz Gonzaga de Oliveira Neto wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for the help.
Would be it be better to try to compile this with the Turbo Pascal compiler
then? Or do you think it would be easier to try to remove the lines with
these codes and continue with FPC? My fear is that in so
Hi all,
Thanks for the help.
Would be it be better to try to compile this with the Turbo Pascal compiler
then? Or do you think it would be easier to try to remove the lines with
these codes and continue with FPC? My fear is that in some of these
modifications I change what the code was supposed t
On 2016-10-17 10:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> I've used it in debugging/hardening fpdoc a few years ago, and had good
> experiences. I also benefited a lot from -CR
Thank you both Marco and Jonas. I only discovered the setting over the
weekend, and it does seem like a useful option to use while
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> How well does the -gt compiler option work? Is it worth enabling during
> debugging?
I've used it in debugging/hardening fpdoc a few years ago, and had good
experiences. I also benefited a lot from -CR
_
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote on Mon, 17 Oct 2016:
How well does the -gt compiler option work?
I don't think there are any known bugs with it in either 3.0 or trunk.
3.0 does not trash ansi/unicodestring function results though, while
trunk does.
Is it worth enabling during
debugging?
I th
Hi,
How well does the -gt compiler option work? Is it worth enabling during
debugging?
Regards,
Graeme
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
30 matches
Mail list logo
