Yeh, the cavalry finally arrives, I am saved. ;-) > it is then the linkers job to link only the object files that are needed > (and really used in the application) to make the executable.
Yes, yes, yes and re-yes. > I guess showing them the content of the ppas.sh file is all that they > should need as proof. Huh, it is already one week (7 days) that I repeat it on each answer. > Some developers are harder to convince about potential problems or bugs. Yes but here it is different. Did you see that they do not want that I answer any more? Sincerely, if it was for one of my project, I never will fight and accept to be insulted in each of their answer, this more than a week. But here it is about the honor of fpc who was accused to produce bad code. > The alternative (if you know exactly what the problem is), is to modify > the ld linker yourself and see if it then works on your system. Yep or prove that a gcc or clang or llvm compiler that use ld + --gc-sections produce binary not usable in multi-arch. ==> https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/58060/ Thanks Graeme, I was beginning to think that I was in a nightmare without end. Fre;D ----- Many thanks ;-) -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Smart-link-in-FreeBSD-multi-arch-tp5726375p5726606.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
