First of all, thanks for Jonas and Sven for the fast answers.
It's unfortunate that you can't provide older versions, but I understand
the reasons exposed.
Thanks for the suggestion, Sven, I'll check the errors I'm having and post
them here for help.
Best regards,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:14 PM
Am 06.10.2016 17:04 schrieb "Luiz Gonzaga de Oliveira Neto" <
luiz.g.oliveira.n...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks in advance for any help!
As Jonas said we can't provide you with any older compiler, but if you'd
tell us what kind of errors you have maybe we can help you. Perhaps it's
merely something were y
plz ignore
--
Dimitrios Chr Ioannidis
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi Graeme,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> Hello Marcos,
>
> On 2016-10-06 at 11:41, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> The COM and CORBA names, are both wrong.
>> When you say COM, everybody thinks on Windows... that sad.
>
>
> Yes, both names are horribly inaccurate. Unfortu
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> Hello Marcos,
>
> On 2016-10-06 at 11:25, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> you need to declarate
>> two variables to do one job.
>> I don't like that and I think shouldn't be necessary.
>
> Well, to be fair, that example is not representative o
Luiz Gonzaga de Oliveira Neto wrote:
> I've found some older versions in this
> link: http://www.freepascal.org/down/old/down.var. But, for Win32, the
> oldest version I've found was the 2.2.2. Is this the oldest version for
> Win32? Is there a place where I could access even older versions of the
Hello Marcos,
On 2016-10-06 at 11:41, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> The COM and CORBA names, are both wrong.
> When you say COM, everybody thinks on Windows... that sad.
Yes, both names are horribly inaccurate. Unfortunately I don't see FPC
developers rectifying that any time soon. :-/
Regards,
G
Hello all,
My name is Luiz and I'm a Masters student at Brazil. This is my first
e-mail in this list.
In my Masters research, I've acquired from the author some codes in Pascal,
a language I've never worked with. I need to make some small modifications
to the code and recompile it, but I'm not ha
Hello Marcos,
On 2016-10-06 at 11:25, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> you need to declarate
> two variables to do one job.
> I don't like that and I think shouldn't be necessary.
Well, to be fair, that example is not representative of a real-world
application. In a real-world app, I would not declare an
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2016-10-06 02:49, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> I understand you, but reference counting help us to write a better
>> code, more object-oriented.
>
> That's got nothing to do with reference counting functionality. I use
> object-oriented cod
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2016-10-05 16:26, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> So, I coded a new example — more simpler, I think — to demonstrate the same
>> problem and prove that there is some wrong that is causing a memleak.
>
> And here is that example converted to us
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 2016-10-06 02:34, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> But, the result was the same, even using D7.
>> So, is this by design? Sad...
>
> Sad and nasty indeed. But it seems it is “by design” or done for “Delphi
> compatibility”.
>
> It would be inte
On 06/10/16 11:08, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I've seem some
COM Interface code where they had to resort to using raw Pointer types
etc to try and avoid reference counting and causing unexpected memory
leaks.
I have also seen plenty of examples of poor coding with classes, but the
fact that someon
On 2016-10-06 02:49, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> I understand you, but reference counting help us to write a better
> code, more object-oriented.
That's got nothing to do with reference counting functionality. I use
object-oriented coding practices all the time, but I don't need
reference counting for
On 2016-10-05 16:26, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> So, I coded a new example — more simpler, I think — to demonstrate the same
> problem and prove that there is some wrong that is causing a memleak.
And here is that example converted to use CORBA style interfaces and no
memory leaks.
Program output:
On 2016-10-06 02:34, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> But, the result was the same, even using D7.
> So, is this by design? Sad...
Sad and nasty indeed. But it seems it is “by design” or done for “Delphi
compatibility”.
It would be interesting to know what Delphi developers think of this.
You should post
On 2016-10-05 23:16, Tony Whyman wrote:
> Used properly reference counted interfaces are very powerful and allow
> for some very elegant programming. Do you complain about AnsiStrings?
I have very powerful and elegant programming with CORBA interfaces too.
;-) Also as Martin mentioned, reference
On 2016-10-06 05:54, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> Recently I had to revive my stone old AMD-K6 PC with Windows 95. What marvel,
> that relict with its age-old applications provides a better user experience,
> is snappier, more convenient and more productive than my newest Linux machine
> with the m
El 05/10/2016 a las 19:47, Michalis Kamburelis escribió:
> 2016-10-05 9:00 GMT+02:00 Maciej Izak :
>> 2016-10-05 4:32 GMT+02:00 Michalis Kamburelis :
>>> For example, the call
>>>
>>> Format('%s', [123])
>>
>> I have a small hint (instead of answer). We have in mORMot / NewPascal in
>> SynCommons
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
> > RTL not to mention that user code that uses "array of const" wouldn't
> > necessarily benefit from it.
> GNU C does check this when using printf() and friends, and rather
> obviously the "array of const" is modeled after the C ellipse notation.
20 matches
Mail list logo
