On 16-Feb-16 18:53, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
...
Sounds like the real-life programs don't use inner loops or don't
solve NP-complete problems :)
For info, my real-life examples are the application server and the DSL
script engine.
So any improvement of quality of FPC's
Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
>>Well, as said before: if the speed of code like this is important
for you,
>>use C.
>It's a wrong choice.
>As we can see and reproduce, at least C# or other Pascal-like
environments
>(Oxygene) are significantly faster.
>http://www.arbinada.com/main/en/node/1532
>
Wh
small remark for your testing series:
AVG makes no sense, you should test against MIN - why ? the measured
results are contaminated by other activities on your system, so the
fastest result is the most accurate, because there is no way to make a
program to run faster, but many ways to make it run
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
environments
>(Oxygene) are significantly faster.
>http://www.arbinada.com/main/en/node/1532
>
What Florian means is that this is very artificial code, and that -
although
he has been able to apply the necessary patches to make FPC faster - the
ne
On 16/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:02:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Van Canneyt
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
>On 15/02/2016 12:00,fpc-pas
