On 16/02/2016 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:02:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Van Canneyt<mich...@freepascal.org>
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions<fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
>On 15/02/2016 12:00,fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
>>Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:55:55 +0100
>>From: Florian Kl?mpfl<flor...@freepascal.org>
>>To:<adr...@veith-system.de>, "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
>> <fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>, Adrian Veith<adr...@vtim.de>
>>Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
>>Message-ID:
>> <152e3b6cc90.27ef.940694a44bcba3a3e493262cc9dc5...@freepascal.org>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>Well, as said before: if the speed of code like this is important for you,
>>use C.
>It's a wrong choice.
>As we can see and reproduce, at least C# or other Pascal-like environments
>(Oxygene) are significantly faster.
>http://www.arbinada.com/main/en/node/1532
>
What Florian means is that this is very artificial code, and that - although
he has been able to apply the necessary patches to make FPC faster - the
necessary optimizations are not likely to help in real-life programs.
Michael.
Sounds like the real-life programs don't use inner loops or don't solve
NP-complete problems :)
For info, my real-life examples are the application server and the DSL
script engine.
So any improvement of quality of FPC's generated code are welcome.
Regards,
Serguei
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
