On 16/02/2016 12:00, [email protected] wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:02:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Van Canneyt<[email protected]>
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
>On 15/02/2016 12:00,[email protected] wrote:
>>Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:55:55 +0100
>>From: Florian Kl?mpfl<[email protected]>
>>To:<[email protected]>, "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
>> <[email protected]>, Adrian Veith<[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark
>>Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>Well, as said before: if the speed of code like this is important for you,
>>use C.
>It's a wrong choice.
>As we can see and reproduce, at least C# or other Pascal-like environments
>(Oxygene) are significantly faster.
>http://www.arbinada.com/main/en/node/1532
>
What Florian means is that this is very artificial code, and that - although
he has been able to apply the necessary patches to make FPC faster - the
necessary optimizations are not likely to help in real-life programs.
Michael.
Sounds like the real-life programs don't use inner loops or don't solve
NP-complete problems :)
For info, my real-life examples are the application server and the DSL
script engine.
So any improvement of quality of FPC's generated code are welcome.
Regards,
Serguei
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
