On Tue, September 17, 2013 20:57, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
> FPC 2.6.2 for DOS/Go32V2
>
> There is the fatal IDE unstability in FPC 2.6.2 under pure DOS.
>
> IDE almost always starts only first time (after installation or reboot).
> I start the IDE, compile and run the program (e.g. Hello.pas) and clos
On Tue, September 17, 2013 20:51, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
> Yes, I know, you are right, so far I've used DOS utility GetDate/GetTime
> without any errors.
>
> I wanted to update the old compiler 1.x to the new version, but it seems
> will stay with the old version.
There should be no problem to conti
> and that operators can be used inside records
I just knew this one :)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Generic-TFPGList-Record-Type-gives-me-compiler-error-Operator-is-not-overloaded-tp5716520p5716541.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General m
FPC 2.6.2 for DOS/Go32V2
There is the fatal IDE unstability in FPC 2.6.2 under pure DOS.
IDE almost always starts only first time (after installation or reboot).
I start the IDE, compile and run the program (e.g. Hello.pas) and close
IDE. But when I want to start IDE again it crashes with SIGSEGV
Yes, I know, you are right, so far I've used DOS utility GetDate/GetTime
without any errors.
I wanted to update the old compiler 1.x to the new version, but it seems
will stay with the old version.
Thank you for your help.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> On Tue, Septemb
Am 17.09.2013 09:44, schrieb Xiangrong Fang:
> My question is, since the programmer is responsible for
> explicitly call object constructors, then why do we need
> constructors at all? In another word, what's the difference
> between an object constructor and an obj
On Tue, September 17, 2013 20:22, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
> It may be, but I tried to use EncodeDateTime with the same result:
>
> DT1:=EncodeDateTime(2013,5,28,15,26,1,0);
> DT2:=EncodeDateTime(2013,5,28,15,27,1,0);
>
> Function EncodeDateTime calls TryEncodeDateTime that uses TryEncodeDate
> and
> T
On 17.09.2013 17:18, Marcos Douglas wrote:
I implemented -- but not up to Git yet -- some like that:
procedure TghSQLHandler.DoOnException(E: Exception);
var
NewEx: EghSQLError;
begin
if Assigned(FOnException) then
FOnException(Self, E)
else
begin
NewEx := EghSQLError.
It may be, but I tried to use EncodeDateTime with the same result:
DT1:=EncodeDateTime(2013,5,28,15,26,1,0);
DT2:=EncodeDateTime(2013,5,28,15,27,1,0);
Function EncodeDateTime calls TryEncodeDateTime that uses TryEncodeDate and
TryEncodeTime.
This is only a test, I want to be sure that after comp
On 17.09.2013 17:39, Dennis Poon wrote:
Sven,
Thanks a lot. It worked.
Generics, advanced record, customized operator ... all these new
features are so cool.
I am impressed that Free Pascal has become so powerful.
At least generics and operator overloads aren't that new. What's new is
that g
On 17.09.2013 17:27, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Another thing you could try (just for testing): change your exception
handler procedure to a function that returns bool and use it like this:
=== code begin ===
procedure TghSQLConnector.Connec
Sven,
Thanks a lot. It worked.
Generics, advanced record, customized operator ... all these new
features are so cool.
I am impressed that Free Pascal has become so powerful.
Dennis
uses fgl;
Type
RScene=record
ID : Word;
Name, Category : String;
end;
TSceneList=special
On 9/17/13, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
> I am doing something wrong?
Probably rounding errors:
DT1:=EncodeDate(2013,5,28)+EncodeTime(15,26,1,0);
2 calculations on floating numbers
DT1:=EncodeTime(15,26,1,0);
1 calculation on floating numbers
Bart
___
fp
I am doing something wrong?
When I encode the date and time then for SecondsBetween
I get 59 instead of 60 and for MilliSecondsBetween also.
When I encode only time then for SecondsBetween I get correct answer 60.
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.2 [2013/02/12] for i386
Target: GO32 v2, i386
Res
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
>> On 15.09.2013 13:05, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>>
>>> [[cut]]
>>>
>>>
>>> I tried. No makes difference.
>>> (could you explain which the difference to call "raise" using "raise E
>>> at
On 17/09/13 15:12, Lukas Gradl wrote:
Hi!
Tried to build the current svn of FPC 2.6.3 (svn Revision 25507) on my
Linux X86_64-box.
I did:
make distclean
make all FPC=
sudo make install PREFIX= FPC=
This worked so far, now I have the current svn as x86_64 compiler.
Then i did:
make clean
mak
On 17.09.2013 14:52, Dennis Poon wrote:
I have this:
uses fgl;
Type
RScene=record
ID : Word;
Name, Category : String;
end;
TSceneList=specialize TFPGList;
The error is: Operator is not overloaded: "RScene" = "RScene"
I suppose the generic thing does not know how to compa
I have this:
uses fgl;
Type
RScene=record
ID : Word;
Name, Category : String;
end;
TSceneList=specialize TFPGList;
The error is: Operator is not overloaded: "RScene" = "RScene"
I suppose the generic thing does not know how to compare 2 records.
How do I solve that?
Dennis
___
Hi!
Tried to build the current svn of FPC 2.6.3 (svn Revision 25507) on my
Linux X86_64-box.
I did:
make distclean
make all FPC=
sudo make install PREFIX= FPC=
This worked so far, now I have the current svn as x86_64 compiler.
Then i did:
make clean
make all CPU_TARGET=i386
This produces a
2013/9/17 Xiangrong Fang
> My question is, since the programmer is responsible for explicitly call
>>> object constructors, then why do we need constructors at all? In another
>>> word, what's the difference
>>> between an object constructor and an object method?
>>>
>>
>> Using the constructor
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
My question is, since the programmer is responsible for explicitly
call object constructors, then why do we need constructors at all? In another
word,
what's the difference
between an object constructor and an ob
>
> My question is, since the programmer is responsible for explicitly call
>> object constructors, then why do we need constructors at all? In another
>> word, what's the difference
>> between an object constructor and an object method?
>>
>
> Using the constructor tells the compiler that it shou
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
Hi All,
Could anyone please explain this:
5.4 Constructors and destructors
As can be seen in the syntax diagram for an object declaration, Free Pascal
supports constructors and destructors. The programmer is responsible for
calling the construc
23 matches
Mail list logo
