Yes, I know, you are right, so far I've used DOS utility GetDate/GetTime without any errors.
I wanted to update the old compiler 1.x to the new version, but it seems will stay with the old version. Thank you for your help. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Tomas Hajny <xhaj...@hajny.biz> wrote: > On Tue, September 17, 2013 20:22, Lubomír Čabla wrote: > > It may be, but I tried to use EncodeDateTime with the same result: > > > > DT1:=EncodeDateTime(2013,5,28,15,26,1,0); > > DT2:=EncodeDateTime(2013,5,28,15,27,1,0); > > > > Function EncodeDateTime calls TryEncodeDateTime that uses TryEncodeDate > > and > > TryEncodeTime. > > > > This is only a test, I want to be sure that after comparing the two > values > > get the correct time difference and 59 seconds is not correct. > > As a principle, you can never avoid such errors if using floating point > numbers. If you need absolutely precise results, use integers. > > Tomas > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Bart <bartjun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 9/17/13, Lubomír Čabla <kla...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I am doing something wrong? > >> > >> Probably rounding errors: > >> DT1:=EncodeDate(2013,5,28)+EncodeTime(15,26,1,0); > >> 2 calculations on floating numbers > >> > >> DT1:=EncodeTime(15,26,1,0); > >> 1 calculation on floating numbers > >> > >> Bart > >> _______________________________________________ > >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal >
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
