Hi,
Wow, Class Factories - I am having nightmarish flashbacks to my college C++
classes.
Okay, Thank you for all of the suggestions. I will try to compare the
suggestions, and see what I can come up with for my situation.
Just for further information:
1. I wasn't really planning on using the
Ah, and you will need a class factory to register the tpersistent
class creators...
And i said my unit is neater ?
here it is :
http://code.google.com/p/pascal-actor-model/source/browse/trunk/rttiobjects.pas
I use it on a lot of things...
All you need is to declare published properties that yo
Simple solution :
Use TSimpleIPC components + my own RTTIObjects unit.
All messages must be descendants of TRTTIObject. (You can use
TPersistent, but i believe my unit is neater for this specific task).
Well, using only standard components i believe you should use
TSimpleIPC components + TPersis
Hi,
I read about MSGPACK before, but it seems to be a binary version of JSON, right?
I actually don't care about the protocol much (and since it's local, Binary vs.
text wouldn't make a lot of difference in transfer speed - though using FPC
native data structures would be faster since they woul
Hi,
I will take a look at WST and see how it fits. Thanks for the tip.
Thank you,
Noah Silva
On 2012/10/29, at 18:43, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I am familiar with the basic underlying methods available for transferring
>>
I have a very simple unit that uses RTTI to stream class instances to
and from strings/streams.
i believe this is an easy foundation on wich to develop something
along the lines of what you are trying to do
2012/10/29 Frank Church :
>
>
> On 29 October 2012 09:43, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>>
Den 30-10-2012 01:04, ik skrev:
Hello,
There are many places such as GitHub, Google Code, Sourceforge etc,
that hosts a lot of open source projects, libraries etc for
FPC/Pascal.
On the other hand we have fppkg that can have repositories and able to
allow us remote download and install of code.
On 30 Oct 2012, at 01:04, ik wrote:
> * I sent it originally for FPC-Others, but it does not appear there
> even in the archive
It did appear on that list, and also in its archive:
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-other/2012-October/000750.html
Jonas
Hello,
There are many places such as GitHub, Google Code, Sourceforge etc,
that hosts a lot of open source projects, libraries etc for
FPC/Pascal.
On the other hand we have fppkg that can have repositories and able to
allow us remote download and install of code.
Ruby has the following web site t
On 29 October 2012 09:43, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>>
>> I am familiar with the basic underlying methods available for
>> transferring data between processes on Windows and Unix, i.e. Pipes, Shared
>> memory, and TCP/IP - but what I am not
On 10 October 2012 05:35, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 6-10-2012 14:34, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> >> On 6-10-2012 6:52, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> >>> Still fighting makefiles with my db fpcunit listener.
>
> >>> Patch including instructions
Op 29-10-12 17:14, Andrew Brunner schreef:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a build box on Win8 x64. I can't get Lazarus to
compile my project. It fails because it uses postgresql, mysql and
oracle units.
The postgresql compiles units are missing from compiled units folder.
The actual source is listed
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a build box on Win8 x64. I can't get Lazarus to
compile my project. It fails because it uses postgresql, mysql and
oracle units.
The postgresql compiles units are missing from compiled units folder.
The actual source is listed in the source. Their code-tools syste
On 29 Oct 2012, at 15:18, Tomas Hajny wrote:
Out of curiosity, I tried the link to "Phil Hess' templates" at the
bottom
of the download page on FPC main site (your first link) and noticed
that
it leads to nowhere now. Probably something to be fixed before 2.6.2
at
latest (but preferably a
On Mon, October 29, 2012 10:43, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2012, at 05:15, ĺ°ĺ ´ äšäş wrote:
.
.
> You don't have to make any symlinks. You have to follow the
> instructions on the download page:
> * at the top of http://www.freepascal.org/down/i386/macosx-netherlands.var
> * at the bottom
You might find some info on the list archive for fpc-devel:
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-devel/2012-October/030149.html
--
Ewald
On 10/28/2012 04:09 PM, bsquared wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been some time since I have used FPC/Laz. I was looking for some
> information on 'observer patte
On 29 Oct 2012, at 05:15, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
Currently, a beginner user who just wants to use Lazarus has to:
a. Download a multi gigabyte XCode install just for a few MB of
binaries.
And the SDKs.
b. Know what binaries the FPC installer is looking for, where they
will be, and where the instal
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
Greetings,
I am familiar with the basic underlying methods available for transferring data
between processes on Windows and Unix, i.e. Pipes, Shared memory, and TCP/IP -
but what I am not familiar with is any higher level functionality that may be
availabl
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:52 AM, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am familiar with the basic underlying methods available for transferring
> data between processes on Windows and Unix, i.e. Pipes, Shared memory, and
> TCP/IP - but what I am not familiar with is any higher level functionality
> t
On 29/10/2012 03:52, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
Along the same lines, a convenient way to call functions/procedures
with parameters from the "other" process would be greatly
appreciated. (i.e. something like RPC that handles OOP).
Take a look at MTDORB [http://sourceforge.net/projects/mtdorb/]. It is a
fr
On 29/10/2012 03:12, Noah Silva wrote:
Another option for an all pascal solution would be one of the available
XML based data stores.
That's already possible using tiOPF and the XML persistence layer. tiOPF
also supports a TXT and CSV persistence layer (with the stacks of RDBMS
persistence l
On 29/10/2012 04:30, 印場 乃亜 wrote:
Does anyone know if the version of OnGuard listed below is working on
OS X?
Unfortunately, no, I haven't done any work on OS X support yet. Most
things should work relatively easy. The most work would be on the
Machine Identifier code I believe - retrieving
22 matches
Mail list logo
