Hi, I will take a look at WST and see how it fits. Thanks for the tip.
Thank you, Noah Silva On 2012/10/29, at 18:43, Michael Van Canneyt <mich...@freepascal.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, 印場 乃亜 wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I am familiar with the basic underlying methods available for transferring >> data between processes on Windows and Unix, i.e. Pipes, Shared memory, and >> TCP/IP - but what I am not familiar with is any higher level functionality >> that may be available on FPC. >> >> As an example: I have one application with a daemon that uses the IPC >> component to write to a file in CSV format, and then the user application >> reads this (GPS location) data via IPC. Then I have to re-convert this >> string data into a series of floating point values manually, though. The >> IPC component doesn't seem to be reliable on all platforms either (it >> sometimes blocks on OS X, and at least the debug client doesn't seem to work >> at all on Windows 7). >> >> Another disadvantage is that the sequence of launching the applications >> matters, and what's more, it seems there can only be one "client" per >> "server" in many cases. >> >> More to the point, if I want to pass around structures, records, etc.between >> processes - what is the best day? For example, Javascript uses JSON. I >> know there are JSON libraries and various other libraries for Pascal - but I >> don't know what is the most standard way. (I think this kind of >> marshalling/unmarshalling may be more standard in Java and C#, but I don't >> know the "normal" way in Delphi/FPC). >> >> I would prefer to use built-in functionality, rather than learn yet >> another library - and if learning a library, I would prefer to use one >> with lots of users that is actively maintained. Likewise, I would prefer >> to actually "pass" the data, rather than just pass a pointer to it. I >> plan to have the processes run on the same machine, so I don't need a >> solution that works with networking, though that would be fine, of course. >> >> Along the same lines, a convenient way to call functions/procedures with >> parameters from the "other" process would be greatly appreciated. (i.e. >> something like RPC that handles OOP). > > You should try WST. > > It's perfectly suitable for all this. It is actively used and maintained. > You can choose which encoding (binary, soap, JSON) is used, and which > protocol (Direct library, TCP socket, http). > > Michael._______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
