On 3/11/2012 08:08, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list and
then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new members
are moderated by default. This may result in some new members' first real
po
On 11 Mar 2012, at 22:07, Thierry B. wrote:
> So I just try your advice. Builds :
> - 2.6.0 from 2.4.5 : oops, not 2.4.4 but it is : OK
> - 2.6.1 from 2.6.0 : NOK : __missing_command_DATA2INC -b -s fppkg.cfg
> fppkg.inc fppkg
>
> same error, so there is something wrong with 2.6.1
No. It means
Le 11/03/2012 21:35, Sven Barth a écrit :
The only guaranteed and supported way of compiling Free Pascal is to use
the latest release. Thus you should build 2.6.0 with your 2.4.4 (not
2.4.5) and then build 2.6.1 using that 2.6.0.
Regards,
Sven
Thanks,
I believed that for this purpose the "f
On 11.03.2012 21:29, Thierry B. wrote:
Hi,
I come back to freepascal after one year and I wanted to build all
versions from my already installed 2.2.5. Builds:
- 2.4.0 from 2.2.5 : OK
- 2.4.2 from 2.4.0 : OK
- 2.4.4 from 2.4.2 : OK
- 2.4.5 from 2.4.2 : OK
- 2.6.1 from 2.4.5 : NOK : __missing_co
In our previous episode, Thierry B. said:
> I come back to freepascal after one year and I wanted to build all
> versions from my already installed 2.2.5. Builds:
>
> - 2.4.0 from 2.2.5 : OK
> - 2.4.2 from 2.4.0 : OK
> - 2.4.4 from 2.4.2 : OK
> - 2.4.5 from 2.4.2 : OK
> - 2.6.1 from 2.4.5 : NOK :
Hi,
I come back to freepascal after one year and I wanted to build all
versions from my already installed 2.2.5. Builds:
- 2.4.0 from 2.2.5 : OK
- 2.4.2 from 2.4.0 : OK
- 2.4.4 from 2.4.2 : OK
- 2.4.5 from 2.4.2 : OK
- 2.6.1 from 2.4.5 : NOK : __missing_command_DATA2INC -b -s fppkg.cfg
fppkg.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 11 Mar 2012, at 13:21, Frank Church wrote:
>
> > I agree that it is too early to moderate join requests on account of this
> > one message .
>
> I won't moderate join requests (there is no way to know whether a new
> subscriber will be a s
OK. Thanks, Jonas. I'll save a link to this message this time.
--
cobines
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 11 Mar 2012, at 15:46, cobines wrote:
> Is storing and using pointers to temporary strings safe?
No.
> Like in the
> following program. I think I remember reading on the mailing list that
> it is not, but I cannot find it. How can I prove one way or the other?
The only thing you can prove i
Hello.
Is storing and using pointers to temporary strings safe? Like in the
following program. I think I remember reading on the mailing list that
it is not, but I cannot find it. How can I prove one way or the other?
I could not get the program to crash, even if I used 20 variables, it
didn't sho
On 11 Mar 2012, at 12:39, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> If too much gets moderated, we could install spam assassin on scenergy
> and moderate only messages above a certain treshhold.
Is there no spamassassin on scenergy yet? I wouldn't mind at all if were added.
Jonas__
On 11 Mar 2012, at 13:21, Frank Church wrote:
> I agree that it is too early to moderate join requests on account of this
> one message .
I won't moderate join requests (there is no way to know whether a new
subscriber will be a spammer or not). It's just that their messages will
default to be
On 11 March 2012 12:08, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>
> Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list
>> and then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new
>> members are moderated by default. This may result in some new member
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list and
then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new members
are moderated by default. This may result in some new members' first real posts
to be accidentally discarded along with
Am 11.03.2012 12:29, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the
> list and then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so
> that new members are moderated by default. This may result in some
> new members' first real posts to be
Hi,
Sorry about this spam message. This person simply subscribed to the list and
then sent the message. I've now changed the list options so that new members
are moderated by default. This may result in some new members' first real posts
to be accidentally discarded along with the spam that's h
Help
Best regard, Andi.
On 11 Mar 2012, at 18:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
> Send fpc-pascal mailing list submissions to
>fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc
17 matches
Mail list logo