> Hi,
>
> There are a few regex units include with FPC and Lazarus, and dozens more
> available for Delphi (and probably FPC too).
>
> Which one is the most well known, or best to use, or most feature complete
> regarding syntax etc...?
>
> * /packages/regexpr/src/old/regexpr.pp
> * /packages/reg
Has anybody done a speed test between these two, to see how they perform
with large test files?
> * /packages/regexpr/src/regexp.pp
vs
> * /components/synedit/synregexpr.pas
> * TRegExpr (no idea what is latest and if FPC compatible)
>From the following link it sounds like TRegExpr is do
David W Noon wrote:
>
> If I were shipping compiled binaries, I would take a more "lowest
> common denominator" approach, specifying an 80386 or some such.
> However, I don't have that problem.
Yes, we do that for our released products too. I was simply playing around
with optimisation settings t
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:16:53 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote about Re:
[fpc-pascal] Which -Op??? parameter is appropriate:
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> >
> > Is -OpPENTIUMM better or worse than -OpPENTIUM4? Is any of them
> > appropriate for a Core2Quad CPU?
>
> OK, I think I answered my own que
On 26 Feb 2010, at 11:37, ik wrote:
I've made a small test:
if (0.1+0.2) = 0.3 then
The only compiler/interpator that actually tells that it equal is FPC.
Then you are very lucky that FPC says it is equal.
I've tested it using Javascript (in Firefox), Ruby, Python, C (gcc)
and
Perl.
T
In our previous episode, ik said:
> I've made a small test:
>
> if (0.1+0.2) = 0.3 then
>
> The only compiler/interpator that actually tells that it equal is FPC.
>
> I've tested it using Javascript (in Firefox), Ruby, Python, C (gcc) and
> Perl.
>
> Except FPC, everyone tells that 0.1+0.2 = 0.
Please forgot my stupid question.
GetMem works perfectly as described in the documentation. My problem
cames from an another part of my program.
Yann
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinf
Hello,
I've made a small test:
if (0.1+0.2) = 0.3 then
The only compiler/interpator that actually tells that it equal is FPC.
I've tested it using Javascript (in Firefox), Ruby, Python, C (gcc) and
Perl.
Except FPC, everyone tells that 0.1+0.2 = 0.30004
Can someone explain how FPC
Hi,
I'm looking for a function or a procedure that tries to allocate
memory and return nil on failure.
GetMem seems to be a good candidate but it doesn't works as expected.
The FreePascal documentations
(http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/getmem.html) tells
that it returns nil on fail
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> Is -OpPENTIUMM better or worse than -OpPENTIUM4? Is any of them
> appropriate for a Core2Quad CPU?
OK, I think I answered my own question when I tried it on my projects.
-OpATHLON64 seems to be the option for my CPU type. 'fpc -i' gives you the
available options. L
System used: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz with 4GB memory
FPC 2.4 64-bit under Ubuntu 8.04.2 LTS 64-bit
Which -Op??? can I use to optimize my application best for the above system?
Is -OpPENTIUMM better or worse than -OpPENTIUM4? Is any of them
appropriate for a Core2Qua
11 matches
Mail list logo
