On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:16:53 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote about Re: [fpc-pascal] Which -Op??? parameter is appropriate:
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > > > Is -OpPENTIUMM better or worse than -OpPENTIUM4? Is any of them > > appropriate for a Core2Quad CPU? > > OK, I think I answered my own question when I tried it on my projects. > > > -OpATHLON64 seems to be the option for my CPU type. 'fpc -i' gives > you the available options. Lazarus IDE seems to use a hard-coded set > of values, not actually what the current fpc compiler supports. I always put my hardware-specific options in /etc/fpc.cfg, so that all users [of the compiler] on my systems get the right options for local usage of the compiled applications. Hopefully, Lazarus does not override them with any hard-coded values. If I were shipping compiled binaries, I would take a more "lowest common denominator" approach, specifying an 80386 or some such. However, I don't have that problem. -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] ======================================================================= [email protected] (David W Noon) ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
