I wrote that and it still doesn't work.
What I put :
/usr/lib/fpc/2.2.0/units/i386-linux/rtl
/usr/lib/fpc/2.2.0/units/i386-linux/packages/*
/usr/lib/fpc/2.0.0/units/i386-linux/rtl
/usr/lib/fpc/2.0.0/units/i386-linux/packages/*
AFAIK gcc has an option to compile header files, but I don't know the
internal format
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Porting-discussion-tp20892236p20934171.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 10:50 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > To increaase compatibility to Linux it would be great if it is possible
> > to create a keyword which it makes possible to include C-headers and then
> > do automatically the binding
In our previous episode, Prince Riley said:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Eclipse was first released as a Java development IDE several years ago, but
> if you take a look at the Eclipse web site www.eclipse.org you'll see that
> since then Eclipse has evolved and been extended to support Ruby, P
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Prince Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eclipse was first released as a Java development IDE several years ago, but
> if you take a look at the Eclipse web site www.eclipse.org you'll see that
> since then Eclipse has evolved and been extended to support Ruby, Py
Jurgen and Bee made a few rich contrasting points about Borland's past
mistakes. However, we must acknowledge that Borland's biggest problem was
Borland persisten failure to deliver 'price competitive' and 'high value'
programming tools.
No one denies Borland's well earned reputation for innovatio
