Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 10:50 schrieb Marco van de Voort: > In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said: > > To increaase compatibility to Linux it would be great if it is possible > > to create a keyword which it makes possible to include C-headers and then > > do automatically the binding stuff. > > > > That means that fpc woul be able to parse C-code (headers). > > > > If that is possible. > > Not, or at least not enough to be robust. A lot of C headers is based on > (macro,define) substitution, IOW it needs context of use to obtain the full > meaning. > > This is also why the header conversion tool only works to a certain degree. > If headers are reasonably clean it can work ok. If you have hundreds of > macros and special constructs it needs manual work. (for which I can't > imagine a solution, even in theory).
May it would be a solution if the C-compiler which compiles the library generates a 'generic library interface file' or something similar with all necessary information. Because the compiler has all the information. From this 'generic library interface file' it will be easier to convert a pascal header interface file. Or the C-compiler generates it directly for pascal. ---> 'pascal library interface file' or similar... That I can imagine could be a solution, but the C-compiler programmers have to implement this function. The full meaning-context can be read in the original C-header file then. > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal