Francisco Reyes writes:
Is the time displayed in UTC? Seems to be.
Any way to make the time displayed be my timezone?
Nevermind that...
Was confused because the date was in a different format..
You pointed me in the right direction and finished the program.
__
Pete Cervasio writes:
TDateTime values. Look for UnixToDateTime and DateTimeToUnix in DateUtils.
The documentation I have must be old (even though I got it a few days ago
from the website). It says those functions are not implemented, yet I was
able to use it.
Is the time displayed in UTC
Bee --
You make a very excellent point in your post and one that I think doesn't
get repeated loudly enough into the ears of the Embarcadero folks. Maybe its
time for an open letter posted to
these kinds of lists and sending their president a e-mail with the link to
read the comments for himself.
something i just read at http://www.firebirdnews.org and in Marco
Cantu's blog ( http://blog.marcocantu.com/blog/coderage_2008_closing
.html)
Sometimes I just understand those guys. Delphi (as language) by support of
FreePascal and Lazarus had been already on Mac and Linux since years!
Especi
Options->Directories->Unit. AFAIK the IDE doesn't read fpc.cfg but it reads
its own named fp.cfg.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cannot-find-GTK-tp20905508p20907673.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello:
I was trying with some examples about using the GTK library in the FreePascal
IDE (the blue screen) and it says that this unit is missing. Despite that, I
could compile them all using fpc from the command interpreter.
What is happenning? Is there any setting I must change in FP?
Thanks
So, the situation is like this:
1) Target ARM architecture needs to be "told" to FPC since FPC needs
this information to do correct code generation.
2) FPC does not inform GNU assembler of intended ARM architecture for
which assembler code is generated for, which doesn't prevent GNU as
from gener
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 15:04 -0600 schrieb Prince Riley:
> Marc,
>
> Just wanted to say thank you for that info.. much obliged.
If you want to know more about what code the compiler produces there are
two more opportunities:
First you can tell the compiler to not delete the intermediate asse
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 22:24 +0100 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> As far as I can tell it's simply the default behaviour of the
> Makefiles generated by fpcmake:
LOL, so that's the reason why I cannot find it.
Many thanks,
Marc
___
fpc-pascal maillist
On 08 Dec 2008, at 21:58, Marc Santhoff wrote:
I' trying again, apparently I wasn't able to make my problem clear.
I want to write a Makefile.fpc for fpcmake that does the same thing as
any other package inside the $fpc/packages/extra directory tree.
How can I force the output directory of .p
On 08 Dec 2008, at 22:00, Prince Riley wrote:
Sorry, I think you are mistaken.. I did ask which ARM Architecture
and if
you follow the thread back you'll see I even gave examples of what the
assembler options were for ARM
Here is the text of that post
I did not understand your questio
Marc,
Just wanted to say thank you for that info.. much obliged.
Prince
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 13:43 -0600 schrieb Prince Riley:
> > Perhaps the person who coded that support into FP can write back and
> > say which A
Hi,
I' trying again, apparently I wasn't able to make my problem clear.
I want to write a Makefile.fpc for fpcmake that does the same thing as
any other package inside the $fpc/packages/extra directory tree.
How can I force the output directory of .ppu files to the correct place
(being ./units/$
Sorry, I think you are mistaken.. I did ask which ARM Architecture and if
you follow the thread back you'll see I even gave examples of what the
assembler options were for ARM
Here is the text of that post
===
Thanks for that reply ... and yes I meant
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 13:43 -0600 schrieb Prince Riley:
> Perhaps the person who coded that support into FP can write back and
> say which ARM op codes look-up table it uses generating the FP
> compiled code. Is it ARM7? Is it ARM9?, Is it ARM4/5?
As already mentioned by Jonas: it is the Ach
On 08 Dec 2008, at 20:43, Prince Riley wrote:
What I keep asking here and not getting a precise answer about is what
specific ARM opcodes does the FP support What is its default ARM
architecture is the opcode spec based on?
The problem was that you never asked for which ARM architecture FPC
Sorry to everyone for replying so far down the thread to the points
mentioned earlier.
The FPC ARM support is stated as ' does not specify an ARM architecture' ...
fine ..but there is a major issue there that needs clarification and better
documentation.
Is it really safe to have no way to target
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 19:22 +0100 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 08 Dec 2008, at 18:26, Marc Santhoff wrote:
>
> > There are some ARM7 (and maybe ARM9, not sure) core variants having no
> > hardware multiplication unit. IIRC the M in TDMI stands for "hardware
> > multiplier unit". Experiences with
On Monday 08 December 2008 10:22:25 Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Francisco Reyes writes:
> > Trying the fstat function and don't seem to be getting the right values
> > for ctime, mtime and atime.
Those values are Unix timestamp values. You need to convert them into
TDateTime values. Look for UnixT
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 08:19 +0200 schrieb Crause, Christo (JC):
> Some proof of the concept: ClassiOS
> (http://www.petros-project.com/index.php/products/classios.html) was
> written in Delphi.
Thanks for pointing this out, I didn't know that one yet.
> Not an open source project, but it s
On 08 Dec 2008, at 18:26, Marc Santhoff wrote:
There are some ARM7 (and maybe ARM9, not sure) core variants having no
hardware multiplication unit. IIRC the M in TDMI stands for "hardware
multiplier unit". Experiences with gcc showed me that the 32x32=64
mult
commands are not used in that ca
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 10:27 +0100 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 08 Dec 2008, at 00:33, Prince Riley wrote:
> > Reading the GNU as manual, the arch parameter value needs to be set
> > to one
> > of several values. It can also specify generic ARM architecture, but
> > that
> > choice in additio
In our previous episode, Prince Riley said:
>
> Like ti weigh in on this thread in the discussion regarding increasing the
> GUI-ness of FP.
> Has anyone looked into writing an Eclipse plug-in for FP (as an was done for
> Python and Ruby)?
Afaik there was a more editor like plugin at one time. B
Francisco Reyes writes:
Trying the fstat function and don't seem to be getting the right values for
ctime, mtime and atime.
-- filedate.pp
uses BaseUnix,DateUtils,SysUtils;
var
info : stat ;
begin
if fpstat ('myfile.txt' , info) <>0 then
begin
writeln ('Fstat failed . Errno : ' ,
Jonas Maebe wrote:
... the assembler can perform for different ARM architectures (except
for some small THUMB things, but FPC doesn't generate THUMB code).
I'd wondered about THUMB support. That means no STM-32 processors, as
THUMB code is all they execute. Bummer, as they are nice and extre
In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> To increaase compatibility to Linux it would be great if it is possible to
> create a keyword which it makes possible to include C-headers and then do
> automatically the binding stuff.
>
> That means that fpc woul be able to parse C-code (header
To increaase compatibility to Linux it would be great if it is possible to
create a keyword which it makes possible to include C-headers and then do
automatically the binding stuff.
That means that fpc woul be able to parse C-code (headers).
If that is possible.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just checked out fpwm and updated it and fpgui locally so it can compile.
> It does almost nothing atm but can reparent and close windows :) not alot. I
> was thinking I might write a widget for resizing and moving windo
Hello
Like ti weigh in on this thread in the discussion regarding increasing the
GUI-ness of FP.
Has anyone looked into writing an Eclipse plug-in for FP (as an was done for
Python and Ruby)?
Given the huge base of Eclipse users this might be a way to reach the goal
with both a better developer t
On 08 Dec 2008, at 00:33, Prince Riley wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Jonas Maebe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
On 07 Dec 2008, at 23:01, Prince Riley wrote:
"FPC does not specify any particular sub-architecture to the
assembler."
was not an opinion or a guess, but a fact. What sub-a
30 matches
Mail list logo
