So, the situation is like this: 1) Target ARM architecture needs to be "told" to FPC since FPC needs this information to do correct code generation.
2) FPC does not inform GNU assembler of intended ARM architecture for which assembler code is generated for, which doesn't prevent GNU as from generating correct binary. 3) GNU as doesn't check if FPC-generated instructions are valid, because it does not know target architecture for which it is assembling. But (as stated in previous point), GNU as is still able to generate correct binary. Correct? Greets, Aleksa On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 22:18, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 08 Dec 2008, at 22:00, Prince Riley wrote: > > Answer: it does not inform the GNU assembler back end of which ARM > architecture is intended. The code generator is not "the GNU assembler > backend". > > Jonas > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
