Depends on taste, and they have both advantages and disadvantages.
I've been googling for this subject, but so far I can't find any satisfying
explanation about the advantages and disadvantages of each mechanism or a
comprehensive comparison between the two.
Any URL for this? TIA.
-Bee-
ha
> On 9/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, does anyone know why lazarus have a slow compilation?
>
> I suppose you are talking about windows, right?
>
> Then it´s a faq:
>
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Faq#Why_is_the_linking_so_slow_on_Windows.3F
>
Nope, i'm not
On 9/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, does anyone know why lazarus have a slow compilation?
I suppose you are talking about windows, right?
Then it´s a faq:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Faq#Why_is_the_linking_so_slow_on_Windows.3F
--
Felipe Monteiro de Car
Hi, does anyone know why lazarus have a slow compilation?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:08:30 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
> > I have a function that will receive a Handle. That handle could be a
> > pointer to a structure, or a object. Is there any safe way to
> > discover it's nature?
>
> No you can't.
>
> > The following code
--- "Leonardo M. Ramé" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Thanks Felipe, i'll try with Apache 2.0.x (i don't really need
> 2.2.x).
>
also, don't forget the bug reports in the wiki page:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/FPC_and_Apache_Modules#Bug_Reporting
Jesus Reyes A.
> I have a function that will receive a Handle. That handle could be a
> pointer to a structure, or a object. Is there any safe way to discover
> it's nature?
No you can't.
> The following code will work when the Handle is an Object or nil, but
> will crash the application when the Handle is a s
On 1 sep 2006, at 19:54, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I have a function that will receive a Handle. That handle could be a
pointer to a structure, or a object. Is there any safe way to discover
it's nature?
No, if only because there is no generic way to distinguish a random
record whi
Hello,
I have a function that will receive a Handle. That handle could be a
pointer to a structure, or a object. Is there any safe way to discover
it's nature?
The following code will work when the Handle is an Object or nil, but
will crash the application when the Handle is a structure:
functi
Thanks Felipe, i'll try with Apache 2.0.x (i don't really need 2.2.x).
--- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/1/06, Leonardo M. Ramé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are there any known bugs with Apache 2.2? or the example doesn't works
> > anymore?
>
> The current bin
On 9/1/06, "Fabrício F. Kammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where are you from?
I'm from São Paulo.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Thank you very much Felipe.
Where are you from?
I'm Brazilian too, from Conchal/SP.
[]s
Fabrício
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho escreveu:
On 9/1/06, "Fabrício F. Kammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have an example of how to use this loop on a thread?
Sorry, but I don't know threads very
Am Freitag, den 01.09.2006, 11:50 +0200 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Carsten Bager wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> sorry, I cannot answer your question, but may I as:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am Donnerstag, den 31.08.2006, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Carsten Bager:
> >>
> >>> I am using the com
On 9/1/06, Leonardo M. Ramé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any known bugs with Apache 2.2? or the example doesn't works anymore?
The current bindings only work for Apache 2.0.x
I am working on converting the headers for 2.2.x. They should be
available for download in 1 week (just a prev
On 9/1/06, "Fabrício F. Kammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have an example of how to use this loop on a thread?
Sorry, but I don't know threads very well.
Yes, I have a very big example. It´s a GUI for a digital oscilloscope board.
The thread code is on the medidor.pas unit
You can do
Thanks Felipe,
Do you have an example of how to use this loop on a thread?
Sorry, but I don't know threads very well.
regards
Fabrício
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho escreveu:
On 9/1/06, "Fabrício F. Kammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to implement a routine on my sofware to be executed e
I downloaded the httpd wrapper and examples from
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/FPC_and_Apache_Modules and can't start
my Apache 2.2.3
server on Win2k SP4 when i include the mod_hello.so file compiled with FPC
2.1.1 and 2.0.4
Are there any known bugs with Apache 2.2? or the example doe
On 9/1/06, "Fabrício F. Kammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to implement a routine on my sofware to be executed each 5 minutes.
Write a loop that first stores the current time, then executed
whatever you need, and then sleeps until current_time - previous_time
= 5 minutes. Like this:
Hi all,
I need to implement a routine on my sofware to be executed each 5 minutes.
I'm using just FPC (without lazarus) becuase my software will run as a
console application and because I don't have graphical inteface on the
machine that I'm using.
How can I make a routine that works on both
On 9/1/06, Rainer Stratmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has someone another opinion, or is it only allowed to say something if someone
has the same opinion???
Of course it´s allowed! I for example disagree.
That´s why I created the bounties:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Bounties
--
Feli
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 13:52 schrieb Leonardo M. RamX:
> Maybe a third party can distribute a commercial version of FreePascal /
> Lazarus and share profits with the FPC community/team. Just like many linux
> distributions do (think of something like RedHat, Debian, etc.).
Maybe it can be a
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 14:37 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 1 sep 2006, at 14:40, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> >> Who said you or someone else cannot say anything because you have a
> >> different opinion?
> >
> > May be that is an aspect of Mailing lists in general.
>
> It is not an aspect of this
On 1 sep 2006, at 14:40, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Who said you or someone else cannot say anything because you have a
different opinion?
May be that is an aspect of Mailing lists in general.
It is not an aspect of this mailing list. Please don't be so prejudiced.
Jonas
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 14:15 schrieb Leonardo M. RamX:
> Yes, of course. Buf i think if you make money from an open source software
> it's your responsibility to compensate in some way to the developers of
> that software.
...can you explain it a little more? May be my english is not the bes
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 14:01 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 1 sep 2006, at 13:46, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> >>> Then it gets a duty and gets boring.
> >>
> >> I so agree with that! :-)
> >
> > Has someone another opinion, or is it only allowed to say something
> > if someone
> > has the same opi
Yes, of course. Buf i think if you make money from an open source software it's
your
responsibility to compensate in some way to the developers of that software.
--- "Leonardo M. Ramé" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, of course. But if i
>
> --- Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
Hi all...
I've always been confused about this subject... flag or exception for error
handling? Can anyone share knowledges and ideas about when and where and why
a (pascal) developer should chose one over another?
This is highly developer dependent
Yes, of course. But if i
--- Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1 sep 2006, at 13:52, Leonardo M. RamX wrote:
>
> > Maybe a third party can distribute a commercial version of
> > FreePascal / Lazarus and share profits
> > with the FPC community/team. Just like many linux distributi
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 13:27 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 9/1/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So why not make a commercial Version of it, if it is better?
Then you can concentrate more on your work and the work you like!
T
On 1 sep 2006, at 13:52, Leonardo M. RamX wrote:
Maybe a third party can distribute a commercial version of
FreePascal / Lazarus and share profits
with the FPC community/team. Just like many linux distributions do
(think of something like
RedHat, Debian, etc.).
They can even do that witho
On 1 sep 2006, at 13:46, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Then it gets a duty and gets boring.
I so agree with that! :-)
Has someone another opinion, or is it only allowed to say something
if someone
has the same opinion???
Who said you or someone else cannot say anything because you have a
On 1 sep 2006, at 13:37, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
No, because then you also have to concentrate on the commercial/
business aspects.
If you want to sell less quality products thats right. It is much
more easyer
if you have products that have a good quality and if you have
people who are
i
Maybe a third party can distribute a commercial version of FreePascal / Lazarus
and share profits
with the FPC community/team. Just like many linux distributions do (think of
something like
RedHat, Debian, etc.).
My opinion.
--- Rainer Stratmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. Sept
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 13:27 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> On 9/1/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So why not make a commercial Version of it, if it is better?
> > > Then you can concentrate more on your work and the work you like!
> >
> > Then it gets a duty and gets bor
On 9/1/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So why not make a commercial Version of it, if it is better?
> Then you can concentrate more on your work and the work you like!
Then it gets a duty and gets boring.
I so agree with that! :-)
Graeme.
___
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 13:00 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 1 sep 2006, at 12:20, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> >> It does not really compile faster.
> >> In most cases it does link faster, but that will be remedied soon :-)
> >
> > So why not make a commercial Version of it, if it is better?
> > The
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 11:51 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 05:12 schrieb Bisma Jayadi:
http://blogs.borland.com/nickhodges/archive/2006/08/26/27022.aspx#FeedBa
ck
What do you think? :)
Wha
On 1 sep 2006, at 12:20, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
It does not really compile faster.
In most cases it does link faster, but that will be remedied soon :-)
So why not make a commercial Version of it, if it is better?
Then you can concentrate more on your work and the work you like!
No, because
Bisma Jayadi wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> I've always been confused about this subject... flag or exception for
> error handling? Can anyone share knowledges and ideas about when and
> where and why a (pascal) developer should chose one over another?
Depends on taste, and they have both advantages and
Hi all...
I've always been confused about this subject... flag or exception for error
handling? Can anyone share knowledges and ideas about when and where and why a
(pascal) developer should chose one over another?
TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
_
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 11:51 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 05:12 schrieb Bisma Jayadi:
> >> http://blogs.borland.com/nickhodges/archive/2006/08/26/27022.aspx#FeedBa
> >>ck
> >>
> >> What do you think? :)
> >
> > W
>
> On 31 aug 2006, at 13:13, Carsten Bager wrote:
>
> > Here is 2 examples of how the fpc compiler dos when comparing a
> > string constant with a pchar . The first is compiled with the 204
> > compiler and second one is compiled with the 202 compiler.
>
> The reason we now favour ansistring of
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 05:12 schrieb Bisma Jayadi:
http://blogs.borland.com/nickhodges/archive/2006/08/26/27022.aspx#FeedBack
What do you think? :)
What is the advantage of the Delphi IDE?
Imo that's the (only?) advantage Delphi has (and fa
On 31 aug 2006, at 13:13, Carsten Bager wrote:
Here is 2 examples of how the fpc compiler dos when comparing a
string constant with a pchar . The first is compiled with the 204
compiler and second one is compiled with the 202 compiler.
The reason we now favour ansistring of shortstring in cas
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 05:12 schrieb Bisma Jayadi:
> http://blogs.borland.com/nickhodges/archive/2006/08/26/27022.aspx#FeedBack
>
> What do you think? :)
What is the advantage of the Delphi IDE?
Imo that's the (only?) advantage Delphi has (and faster compilation).
Rainer
___
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Carsten Bager wrote:
Hi,
sorry, I cannot answer your question, but may I as:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.08.2006, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Carsten Bager:
I am using the compiler on an embedded Arm 7 platform and Ansi
strings is not an option.
How can you do this?
The 2.0.2 su
> Hi,
>
> sorry, I cannot answer your question, but may I as:
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 31.08.2006, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Carsten Bager:
>
> > I am using the compiler on an embedded Arm 7 platform and Ansi
> > strings is not an option.
>
> How can you do this?
The 2.0.2 supports the ARM proces
47 matches
Mail list logo
