Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling FPC for SPARC

2006-08-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
Mark Morgan Lloyd schreef: Tomas Hajny wrote: I propose to check with the 2.0.4-rc2 sources. You can get these from ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.0.4-rc2/source/, That builds (make cycle) OK on/for linux-i386 using FPC 2.0.2, but on linux-sparc using FPC 2.0.0 I get: Target OS: Lin

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling FPC for SPARC

2006-08-02 Thread Peter Vreman
> Tomas Hajny wrote: > >> I propose to check with the 2.0.4-rc2 sources. You can get these from >> ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.0.4-rc2/source/, > > That builds (make cycle) OK on/for linux-i386 using FPC 2.0.2, but on > linux-sparc using FPC 2.0.0 I get: > > Target OS: Linux for SPARC >

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling FPC for SPARC

2006-08-02 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Tomas Hajny wrote: > I propose to check with the 2.0.4-rc2 sources. You can get these from > ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/2.0.4-rc2/source/, That builds (make cycle) OK on/for linux-i386 using FPC 2.0.2, but on linux-sparc using FPC 2.0.0 I get: Target OS: Linux for SPARC Compiling syst

Re[2]: Minor issue compiling FPC from sources [fpc-pascal]

2006-08-02 Thread ϸ�� ����������� � mail.ru
Hi, Eugene, Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 8:25:50 PM: EM> No, I don't, and it's FPC's make that is called. That's the strangest. Maybe EM> someone can explain, where the "echo" command is expected to be taken? Maybe EM> I missed something simple like a symlink from echo to gecho? EM> Sincerely your

Re: [fpc-pascal] Offline documentation for Extra Packages

2006-08-02 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Mittwoch, den 02.08.2006, 13:41 +0200 schrieb Jonas Maebe: > On 2 aug 2006, at 05:39, Andi Purwito wrote: > > > Where i can download offline doc about extra packages such as > > ncurses, gtk, etc. > > These are Pascal interfaces to C packages. In general there is no > Pascal documentation

Re: Minor issue compiling FPC from sources [fpc-pascal]

2006-08-02 Thread Eugene Mayevski
Hello! You (Tiziano_mk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote about "Re: [fpc-pascal] Minor issue compiling FPC from sources" on 08/2/2006 at 09:56: T> maybe you have delphi installed in your system? No, I don't, and it's FPC's make that is called. That's the strangest. Maybe someone can explain, wher

Re: [fpc-pascal] pipe question

2006-08-02 Thread Adam Naumowicz
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 2 aug 2006, at 17:33, Adam Naumowicz wrote: Is there a way to launch an external command, feed its input and catch its output on Unix? AFAIK POpen allows to get hold of the input or output, but not both - or am I missing something? Of course, one cou

Re: [fpc-pascal] pipe question

2006-08-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 2 aug 2006, at 17:33, Adam Naumowicz wrote: Is there a way to launch an external command, feed its input and catch its output on Unix? AFAIK POpen allows to get hold of the input or output, but not both - or am I missing something? Of course, one could open a temporary file to store the

[fpc-pascal] pipe question

2006-08-02 Thread Adam Naumowicz
Hi, Is there a way to launch an external command, feed its input and catch its output on Unix? AFAIK POpen allows to get hold of the input or output, but not both - or am I missing something? Of course, one could open a temporary file to store the command's input or output and then redirect,

Re: =?koi8-r?Q?Re[2]=3A_[fpc-pascal]_Offline_documentation_for_Extra_Packag es?=

2006-08-02 Thread Eduardo
At 15:39 02/08/2006, you wrote: > These are Pascal interfaces to C packages. In general there is no > Pascal documentation available. However, since they are straight > translations the C documentation should apply almost literally to the > Pascal versions. > Jonas Is there a note/memo about typ

Re: Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] Offline documentation for Extra Packages

2006-08-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 2 aug 2006, at 15:39, Пётр Косаревский wrote: These are Pascal interfaces to C packages. In general there is no Pascal documentation available. However, since they are straight translations the C documentation should apply almost literally to the Pascal versions. Is there a note/memo about

Re[2]: [fpc-pascal] Offline documentation for Extra Packages

2006-08-02 Thread Пётр Косаревский
> These are Pascal interfaces to C packages. In general there is no > Pascal documentation available. However, since they are straight > translations the C documentation should apply almost literally to the > Pascal versions. > Jonas Is there a note/memo about types mapping? There should be

Re: [fpc-pascal] Offline documentation for Extra Packages

2006-08-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 2 aug 2006, at 05:39, Andi Purwito wrote: Where i can download offline doc about extra packages such as ncurses, gtk, etc. These are Pascal interfaces to C packages. In general there is no Pascal documentation available. However, since they are straight translations the C documentatio

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling FPC for SPARC

2006-08-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 2 aug 2006, at 10:20, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Not only that, but a kernel crash always means something is wrong in the kernel. No matter how badly a program is written, the (Linux) kernel should never crash (UML or otherwise). Yes, agreed. I might re-test as I get to understand things bet

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling FPC for SPARC

2006-08-02 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 2 aug 2006, at 00:47, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > > > * If I run the tests (make full) on i386 2.0.2 I get a UML (User > > Mode Linux on > > 2.4.32) kernel crash on testfpuc.pp. I'll try and check this out on > > a "real" > > system presently, I've found UML to be pretty

[fpc-pascal] Offline documentation for Extra Packages

2006-08-02 Thread Andi Purwito
Dear pascalholics,Where i can download offline doc about extra packages such as ncurses, gtk, etc.Thanks How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lis

Re: [fpc-pascal] Compiling FPC for SPARC

2006-08-02 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 2 aug 2006, at 00:47, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: * If I run the tests (make full) on i386 2.0.2 I get a UML (User Mode Linux on 2.4.32) kernel crash on testfpuc.pp. I'll try and check this out on a "real" system presently, I've found UML to be pretty robust but knowing the effort that's