Jonas Maebe wrote: > > On 2 aug 2006, at 00:47, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > > > * If I run the tests (make full) on i386 2.0.2 I get a UML (User > > Mode Linux on > > 2.4.32) kernel crash on testfpuc.pp. I'll try and check this out on > > a "real" > > system presently, I've found UML to be pretty robust but knowing > > the effort > > that's going into FPC on i386 I'd suspect a kernel problem first. > > Not only that, but a kernel crash always means something is wrong in > the kernel. No matter how badly a program is written, the (Linux) > kernel should never crash (UML or otherwise).
Yes, agreed. I might re-test as I get to understand things better. However my interest is in the SPARC side of things at present and I hope I'll be forgiven for not following this one up. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
